Do you think the DL + 3% would be offered without the merger ?FWAAA said:You were correct - AA did mortgage everything to raise those billions in cash, but the point is that there was a zero percent probability that AA was going out of business. AA filed for Ch 11 so it could score a win over the stubborn pilots and FAs, who refused to agree to more efficient contracts unless they got "restore and more" type compensation. AA certainly didn't file for Ch 11 because it had to or because it had run out of options (the reasons US, UA, NW and DL all filed for bankruptcy protection).
There was no guarantee that AA would become insanely profitable, but that's not a satisfactory excuse for trading away profit sharing for small wage increases.
By 12/31/2012, before the formal announcement of the merger, AA had almost turned the corner to profitability in its first year in bankruptcy. The 2012 net loss was just $130 million, excluding special items and reorganization expenses, a $900 million improvement over 2011's results. On a stand-alone basis in 2013, AA earned $1.0 billion in profits, excluding special items and reorg expenses, about the same as United earned in 2013.