Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
And I said the reason the APA split no longer exists. Jim backed that up. You try to justify USAPA by pointing to the alleged success of the non-ALPA carriers and I submit that the APA is not something you'd want to emulate. Also, recall that the Eagle pilots dumped the APA for ALPA!
"ALPA gave away our retirement" is a nice sound bite but it's not based on fact. It's like saying you give away your wallet to the man holding a gun in your face.
I hope the people who plan on running USAPA are better informed that the promoters on this board.
Yes, but it was for a specific issue. ALPA was wrong in 1963 and has since changed.APA exists because, in the view of the AA pilots, ALPA was protecting ALPA, craming thier will on AA, and doing so to the harm of the AA pilots (in their view).
In this case ALPA's will is it's own Bylaws. No comparison to 1963.Some folks see a similar sitchamoowayshun today.
I don't see ALPA doing this anywhere. You can believe what you want to believe but that doesn't allow you to violate the Bylaws, especially when doing so to spitefully disadvantage another pilot group. ALPA is your convenient scapegoat for your unrealistic expectations.You are trying to tell me what I believe, what my argument is, and then trying to argue your point by defeating "my point" that you assigned to me. Gee..
ALPA is your convenient scapegoat for your unrealistic expectations.
Yes, but it was for a specific issue. ALPA was wrong in 1963 and has since changed.In this case ALPA's will is it's own Bylaws. No comparison to 1963.I don't see ALPA doing this anywhere. You can believe what you want to believe but that doesn't allow you to violate the Bylaws, especially when doing so to spitefully disadvantage another pilot group. ALPA is your convenient scapegoat for your unrealistic expectations.
Yes, but it was for a specific issue. ALPA was wrong in 1963 and has since changed.In this case ALPA's will is it's own Bylaws. No comparison to 1963.I don't see ALPA doing this anywhere. You can believe what you want to believe but that doesn't allow you to violate the Bylaws, especially when doing so to spitefully disadvantage another pilot group. ALPA is your convenient scapegoat for your unrealistic expectations.
Yes, but it was for a specific issue. ALPA was wrong in 1963 and has since changed.
ByLaws for some, guidelines for others. Take your pick. Political expediency to maintain the cash flow.You can believe what you want to believe but that doesn't allow you to violate the Bylaws,
East,
There are quite a few pilots on the west side with military experience,
You're hardly one of them...What's your point? = Sacrifice by way of corporate association?...Spare me/us.
I'll be the first to admit that the chances of me ever getting a scratch was nill to none.
Though I'm flattered that you've researched my earlier posts my opinion on ALPA hasn't changed one bit. I've always been a pragmatist. To paraphrase Churchill, ALPA is the worst union there is, except for all the rest.You did not always think highly of ALPA, what changed your mind?
Anything great to offer in Alpo's defense?