You just cant get over the name calling. It really goes to show how weak your point is.You are both so retaaahhhhddeeeedddddd.... Your cost may be somewhat in line - however the big cost (your pension) is not - which means UA US DAL and NWA B6 and SWA can undercut you in all markets, b/c when the economy improves it helps all carriers not just one... So they will all have that advantage not only that more efficient aircraft, lower paid employees (which i am not proud of) and more efficient work forces - just a fact.. Nor'Easta get a life.. In case you havent realized quite yet, i am much more aware of my surroundings than you, so go crawl back under that snowbank where you belong... I would definitely not be bragging about MIKEYS comments on here.. I dont think CAL will feel the burn as bad as AA but in my opinion AA will be salivating at getting in on the merger mania getting ready to take place - and they shutter at the thought of being kicked to number 3 airline... And it will falter from there.. It should be interesting... You know what they say... what goes around comes around....
Cost's are cost's and no matter how you legitimately measure them against each carrier, they are all close in line with each other. You say "I think" and "my opinion" but offer no hard facts other than that. BS is BS and until you have something to back up what you say it means nothing.
AA and Continental have cost in line with the bankrupt carriers.
AA has been the only airline not giving press releases or CEO and board member talking points about mergers, acquisitions and the supposed impending consolidation of the industry. That would seem to say either they are playing the cards close to the vest, or sitting back and watching the others fall all over themselves and piling on additional debt.