If you'd said makes more money, you'd probably be correct, but your statements have a few false assumptions...
If you look at the TWA dea, today there are 58 markets from STL that didn't exist in 2000. That doesn't include markets like HNL and LGW that were killed off.
The deal with Eastern only involved about 20 markets to Central and South America plus LGW, and just about all of them still carry the same 900-999 series flight numbers that they had when we picked up the routes. Caribbean routes weren't part of the deal because they weren't necessary.
Ok fair enough, but in addtion to the 20 markets, AA also gained a larger market share in those places where EAL was the competitor right?
Many of the Caribbean markets served today from MIA were shifted from SJU after the EAL deal, and all except for perhaps GCM were also served from JFK.
You also give a bit too much credit to Eastern in developing those markets -- all of those markets were originally Braniff routes, served from MIA up until 1982.
I dont recall giving EAL credit for developing them. I was only pointing out that AA profited from EALs demise. Those TWA people who are still sore over the seniority issue, (and show me one example where two union workforces were combined where somebody wasnt claimming to have been screwed), keep insisting that the workers who were at AA prior to the aquisition, somehow owe them something. Some feel that AA workers should be willing to step aside and let them take their jobs. TWA owned those routes and assetts, not the workers of TWA. I, and most of the others I know did not want the company to buy TWA. however we dont own the company either, so it was not our decision.
[post="203427"][/post]