Kev3188
Veteran
Don't need to; his posts say it all...700UW said:Let me PM topdawg and he will tell the board different as will Kevin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Don't need to; his posts say it all...700UW said:Let me PM topdawg and he will tell the board different as will Kevin.
Precisely on point Kev.Kev3188 said:Labor won't get anywhere as long as it obeys the rules it never agreed to.
Operating within the existing structure and expecting success is pointless.
Labor costs are a huge part of this conversation because the cost of labor factors in to the shareholder profits or losses that those analysts want to capitalize on and you know it.FWAAA said:I could have sworn this thread's topic was about Wall St analysts whining that AA should reduce capacity for the benefit of DL, WN and UA.
And there's also a comet racing towards the Earth that's going to wipe out all life as we know it. Just one page WT. We still read two very different books.WorldTraveler said:I think Kev and weasles and I are on the same page now.
Are you a moderator now?FWAAA said:I could have sworn this thread's topic was about Wall St analysts whining that AA should reduce capacity for the benefit of DL, WN and UA.
While i generally don't agree with anything Bob says, He IS in a union and he IS(or was) an officer.WorldTraveler said:spare the race card, BOB.
it doesn't even come close to fitting and it hasn't even been suggested. You are the one that is seeing racism as a part of the issue; I am speaking SOLELY about economics and market forces.
I am not at all saying that you or anyone else should just throw up your hands in desperation and leave because you can't get what you want.
In fact, I have repeatedly said that you and others have to band together and really withhold your services to effect change.
It is you that are content to maintain the status quo and live within an unjust system by not acting OUTSIDE OF THE SYSTEM.
by telling us how unfair the system is because it is stacked against labor BUT NOT TELLING US WHAT YOU ARE DOING ABOUT IT, mgmt. has won.
if you really believe that labor has a leg to stand on, then take a stand.
but you also run the risk that the free market system will indeed work - just like what happened with Reagan and the ATC controllers.
you might win - but the system might hit a long-term reset that will leave labor far worse off than you are before.
but if you act, then you have pressed the free market system to act as it is intended and without government of unfair advantage on either side.
and everything you do in life has consequences and implications, both positive and negative.
as long as you have the "your free to leave" attitude I can safely say that will never happen.WorldTraveler said:I think Kev and weasles and I are on the same page now.
I am not opposed to labor trying to improve its lot... but it won't happen by accepting everything that exists... but like Rosa Parks, you have to push the system that exists to its limits.
The civil rights movement wasn't what ISIS is today which is to overthrow governments and kill people.
that is well beyond labor can accomplish.
but governments in Europe are having to rethink their austerity programs because their people won't accept any more cuts.
Will they succeed long-term? I personally doubt it because someone has to pay the bill and Germany is tired of responsibly managing its economy while other countries don't and then expect Germany to foot the bill.
the US isn't in the same situation.
change can happen.
but my challenge to you is that it really affect the true social change that many of you say you want - and which I support - but which often still leave huge divides in society - specifically between regional carrier and contractor employees on one side and mainline employees on the other.
We need people who will change many of the ways the western capitalist economies work. I would be tickled pink to say that I was part of this board when key people rose up to make a difference.
no but it is.WorldTraveler said:dawg,
it is not a DL or non-DL thing.
it is solely about the performance of the labor movement within the airline industry relative to other airlines such as DL that are less unionized.
I have repeatedly said that I would be happy to see unions succeed at gaining more for their employees.
I also believe that change will have to come from OUTSIDE Of the union structure because there are laws that would punish unions if they violate rulings to not strike.
The government can't tell a bunch of employees who aren't working within the union structure to not walk off the job.
if they are certain enough their peers will join them and they can effect change, they can succeed.
I totally get the imbalance of the RLA and the even greater impact that consolidation is having on labor.
the only way to fix that reality is to work outside of the union structure which companies know how to control.
if you guys voted in a union he would be quick to point out how Delta should pull your PS, outsource etc. etc. just like he did with the FAs.Kev3188 said:Everything's okay until labor gets uppity.
When that happens, look out; all of this "man of the people" nonsense will be gone in a flash...