MCI transplant
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2003
- 5,311
- 584
- Banned
- #46
<_< ----O.K. aa!---- "AA's unions BY LAW had to protect their members at the time"---- Oh! What "LAW" are you alluding to? And what is your defition of "protect?" ---"owed you NO duty of representation."--- That all depends on what time frame your refurring to!----" Ramp and mechanics went to binding arbitration and that isn't good enough for you."----- I don't have a problem with it! It seems aa and the union have a problem implementing what was arbitrated!!! Two Laws suits are case in point!---- As for TWA management Seniority, let me quite you! "Of course seniority in management means nothing."When are you and others going to get it thru your thick skull that the AA unions BY LAW had to protect their members. You were not members at the time so AA's unions owed you NO duty of representation. Ramp and mechanics went to binding arbitration and that still isn't good enough for you. AA fufilled it's promise and hired the twa people like they said they would. Most were furloughed 2 years later because the industry tanked and the twaers were not at the top of the combined lists. Interestingly, the only group of twaers that got their twa seniority was management, the only group where AA management could dictate seniority. Hmmmm. Of course seniority in management means nothing. AA has furloughed nAAtive management people while keeping the managers from twa.