What's new

2015 Fleet Service thread

WeAAsles said:
Not gone Robbed. Just have a lot going on here locally in MIA. Election time and I'm running for Executive Board.

Working the campaign trail.
 
He'll be back...with lots of time on his hands....Don't worry Albert.
 
NYer said:
He'll be back...with lots of time on his hands....Don't worry Albert.
Hey NYer want to have a coffee with me sometime? Oh that's right you're too scared to have a one on one with me face to face. Have to always trot out your underlings to hide behind.

It's ok you know. I won't hurt your little feelings too bad since I know how introverted you are.

December 15. Keep your fingers crossed and no cheating.
 
Ford-UAW...another company and union who see differently than Parker and the TWU.
 
"The contract raises wages for all workers and gradually eliminates the two-tier system, which currently pays newer workers less than veteran ones. It promises bonuses of up to $10,250 per worker this year and annual profit-sharing checks and other bonuses each year after that."
 
There are those ugly words, "bonuses and profit-sharing".
 
AANOTOK said:
Ford-UAW...another company and union who see differently than Parker and the TWU.
 
"The contract raises wages for all workers and gradually eliminates the two-tier system, which currently pays newer workers less than veteran ones. It promises bonuses of up to $10,250 per worker this year and annual profit-sharing checks and other bonuses each year after that."
 
There are those ugly words, "bonuses and profit-sharing".
Why would they pay us bonuses and profit sharing? Our illustrious leadership gave it away for a raise we were going to get anyway. And we are to ignorant to figure it out
 
dfw gen said:
Why would they pay us bonuses and profit sharing? Our illustrious leadership gave it away for a raise we were going to get anyway. And we are to ignorant to figure it out
 

never mind all that; how much more an hour will I be making? let me flip right to the compensation table. Are we learning anything?
 
Not to change gears but ... I would like to open the floor to discussion concerning a proposed DL 141 bylaw change in the upcoming bylaw referendum vote. Article VIII - District Officers Qualifications And Election. The proposed change, to the current language of candidates needing the endorsement of 4 local lodges to appear on the ballot, to the proposed level of 10 local lodge endorsements to appear on the ballot. The floor is open to discussion and opinion on this proposed DL 141 bylaw change. Remember... This bylaw referendum vote takes place in early December.    
 
ograc said:
 
never mind all that; how much more an hour will I be making? let me flip right to the compensation table. Are we learning anything?
yea you proved my point.
 
ograc said:
Not to change gears but ... I would like to open the floor to discussion concerning a proposed DL 141 bylaw change in the upcoming bylaw referendum vote. Article VIII - District Officers Qualifications And Election. The proposed change, to the current language of candidates needing the endorsement of 4 local lodges to appear on the ballot, to the proposed level of 10 local lodge endorsements to appear on the ballot. The floor is open to discussion and opinion on this proposed DL 141 bylaw change. Remember... This bylaw referendum vote takes place in early December.    
I think it looks like a ploy to make it easier for those in power to stay in power.
 
ograc said:
Not to change gears but ... I would like to open the floor to discussion concerning a proposed DL 141 bylaw change in the upcoming bylaw referendum vote. Article VIII - District Officers Qualifications And Election. The proposed change, to the current language of candidates needing the endorsement of 4 local lodges to appear on the ballot, to the proposed level of 10 local lodge endorsements to appear on the ballot. The floor is open to discussion and opinion on this proposed DL 141 bylaw change. Remember... This bylaw referendum vote takes place in early December.
And just how would the aa side be harmed by change?
 
Back
Top