2014 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
luvthe9 said:
I would not have,done it in front of anyone, but this might be a trend where someone else gets in trouble when he fails to respond.
He just ddn't know any better. He said "When did they change that?" I said "Ever since we have been single engine taxiing."  Bottom line. He was given a command and he ignored it. The captain cut him some slack for being ignorant.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
Mutatismundaffy sez
PHX 1072
Those batting less than 1000 are:
953 CLT
869 PHL
176 DCA
Minus Continental and Freedom scabs
Who is next in the West loser line- up for posting ?

Should be right around December I think.
 
luvthe9 said:
Hey are little Napoleon FBI failure is here, how about a polygraph Doyal?
Ha! You just keep holding on to your little fantasy you sclob. That's SCAB/SLOB combo just for you. The Liar SCLOB Courtney Borman. Maybe you can be furlough administrator again after your forth coming staple job.
 
Res Judicata said:
Ha! You just keep holding on to your little fantasy you sclob. That's SCAB/SLOB combo just for you. The Liar SCLOB Courtney Borman. Maybe you can be furlough administrator again after your forth coming staple job.
Remember, it's a dry heat!
 
A320 Driver said:
Want to end up unemployed?
I spent the better part of my day with an attorney who is very familiar with Labor Law. Let's explore your threat. I know the players here, one in particular who doesn't like bag stickers, online posts that he does not like, ties and drops them on a desk. Some of these are the same players who have been harrassing pilots and think they are protected from personal liability. There are many ways on getting info on who your accusers are.

Employees are allowed to speak out about their working conditions and speak out about those conditions. Are you familiar with an organization called the National Labor Relations Board? There are free speech protections.

"That agency is the National Labor Relations Board, or NLRB. This board was established in 1935 to enforce our nations basic labor law, the National Labor Relations Act, and is responsible for maintaining U.S. labor law and protecting workers rights to organize. But its also the protector of employees right to speak out online about working conditions without fear of firing or discipline.

Social media free speech has become an important and growing focus of the NLRB. Acting Labor Board General Counsel Lafe Solomon noted that there has been a strong uptick in the number of social media cases handled by the Board, including over 100 cases involving social media since 2010. These include:

Discussing Work Conditions: At Hispanics United of Buffalo, a nonprofit social services provider in New York, Mariana Cole-Rivera started a Facebook thread, asking, Lydia Cruz, a coworker feels that we don't help our clients enough at HUB. I about had it! My fellow coworkers how do you feel? Her colleagues immediately voiced their support, writing, Try doing my job. I have five programs and What the hell, we dont have a life as is. Cole-Rivera and four caseworkers who responded to her lost their jobs. But the NLRB found that their posts were the type of concerted activity for mutual aid that is expressly protected by the NLRA, since it involved a conversation among coworkers about their terms and conditions of employment, including their job performance and staffing levels. The judge ordered that the fired workers be fully reinstated to their jobs with back pay."

You also have to be aware of state laws concerning public policy.

"There are a number of states that have laws that prohibit employers from terminating employees when the terminations are in violation of public policy. In other words, these laws stop employers from firing employees for reasons that the public would find morally reprehensible or ethically wrong. These laws are often difficult for employers to follow, as morals and ethics are subjective and will vary from state to state. It is not uncommon for some state laws to differ form the laws of other states."

The accused have to right to sue:

Yes you can sue someone for calling your employer and trying to get your fired by knowlingly providing false information. Calling your employer and giving false information would be "slander," which is a form of defamanation (the other type of defamation is "libel," which are written statement.

Nuff said. I hope I made myself clear.

Trader, I hope you took notes.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
The accused have to right to sue:

Yes you can sue someone for calling your employer and trying to get your fired by knowlingly providing false information. Calling your employer and giving false information would be "slander," which is a form of defamanation (the other type of defamation is "libel," which are written statement.

Nuff said. I hope I made myself clear.
 
 
 
CactusPilot1: "there was an incident where there was an assault in the Ucrapa office, police called. I welcome the day one of you pull a stunt like that with me."...."East trait: Very pushy until someone pushes back. LMFAO"..."See, there goes the Usapacrap and yellow lanyards....COWARDS"...."Run your mouth it in the crew van some day. Compliment my Liberty tie or my Cactus 18 shirt in the gym."
 
Now it's: "The accused have to right to sue:"...? Seriously? ;) It seems the schoolboy braggadocio has gotten a bit old kid...?
 
"Nuff said. I hope I made myself clear."
 
Sigh...Son?..."You'se" couldn't possibly make yourself any more "clear", given your already existing transparency. A chest-beating, proudly self-proclaimed 190 pound six footer who brags on gym membership, once again threatening people with lawyers, simply has to be laughed at. In any case; for better or worse for all concerned; no Code Duello is currently in use in this country. "You'se" could always settle for just a flying wager. :)
 
Per "COWARDS"? Please be gentle. Not all of us could ever even dream of attaining such noble heights as becoming imaginary "Spartan"..umm..."soldiers" in the "army" of leo-whatever...
 
EAST you gotta give CATPISS1 credit he consulted an attorney that knew something about "LABOR LAW", ! Probably one of the 18 morons that thought sending feces , rocks and tieing up a safety hotline was smart! Or maybe he sought out DOYAL for some expert consultation!
 
EastUS1 said:
CactusPilot1: "there was an incident where there was an assault in the Ucrapa office, police called. I welcome the day one of you pull a stunt like that with me."...."East trait: Very pushy until someone pushes back. LMFAO"..."See, there goes the Usapacrap and yellow lanyards....COWARDS"...."Run your mouth it in the crew van some day. Compliment my Liberty tie or my Cactus 18 shirt in the gym."
 
Now it's: "The accused have to right to sue:"...? Seriously? ;) It seems the schoolboy braggadocio has gotten a bit old kid...?
 
"Nuff said. I hope I made myself clear."
 
Sigh...Son?..."You'se" couldn't possibly make yourself any more "clear", given your already existing transparency. A chest-beating, 190 pound six footer who brags on gym membership, once again threatening people with lawyers, simply has to be laughed at. In any case; for better or worse for all concerned; no Code Duello is currently in use in this country. "You'se" could always settle for just a flying wager. :)
 
Per "COWARDS"? Please be gentle. Not all of us could ever even dream of attaining such noble heights as becoming imaginary "Spartan"..umm..."soldiers" in the "army" of leo-whatever...
How do CLOWNS like you fly? Here's a possiblity because you are full of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top