Why I Voted Yes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ken, go sit in the truck.... B)

Instead of acting a child. Take this post of mine, break it down paragraph by paragraph and with your manual and your facts, prove that this is just a fantasy and not possible.

Do you deny that those imposed terms upon abbrogation could be this T/A? And that we would be in the same place contractually as a yes vote would result in, except that we have an open window to negotiate further? The Judge does not impose the terms, AA will do that and they can impose this T/A and move along with the process and continue to work towards consenual agreements.

Politically, Public Opinion, NMB Policy, and even Legally to have a tentative agreement on the table that would be the terms for 6 years that AA says they could live with and then to revert back to 3/22 would be a mistake. AA wants and needs labor peace more than you seem to be able to imagine. There is no strike, there is no replacement workers, there is no alternative but to have reasonably happy AMT's with the potential and understanding for more negotiations to continue.

Imposing 3/22 would create a war that AA would have on it's hands with the Maintenance Department and thus would not be productive to their desires and NEEDS at this time. They want an agreement, but their hands have been tied by the UCC, BK rules, the Judge, and the "me too" clauses as to what they can even offer us now.

And it doesn't take 6 years to get away from those obstacles. Unless you vote yes and make it that long.

I agree with you that the 2010 T/A is still far better than anything we will see while AA is in Bankruptcy and beyond now, but once the company gets an approved plan of reorganization, the "me too" clauses of the other work groups expire, at that time, given that the Mechanic and Related group is the only group that was already last in the industry going in, I think have a very high chance of getting a better agreement. In other words, once we are away from the eyes of the UCC and the Judge, and AA has emerged, we stand a better chance of something worth voting on. Could be that pressure mounts to have that agreement before any plan to emerge is approved. Nobody knows that aspect. But it doesn't change the fact that Labor Peace is key to success.

In contrast, if this passes, we are stuck for 6 long years, or at least until early open becomes an option but that was of no value on our current agreement, it was there, and never used. Is there risk in my opinion of the situation? Yes, but given the extensive cost of the current T/A, and the fact that Job Security is gone completely, I think the risk is worth a look at moving towards the next step without giving them this version of consensual agreement or force another round of ermegency negotiations. But that requires one to eliminate the FEAR, and view this from logical thinking about what the next steps going forward would look like.

You look at this from the worst possible outcome, and that is just not the most likely outcome, possible yes, likely no.

I am willing to move forward in the process, and to reach the point that the UCC and the Judge is no longer an obstacle to us getting our fair share. If the company is as evil as you claim they would be upon abbrogation, then management would be offering this T/A to appease the courts, but you and I sure as hell would not see them making vote yes videos, and traveling the system peddling the crap. And allowing Union Meetings on company time while screaming labor cost problems would be unthinkable and never allowed. Think about it. Your opinion of abbrogation is worse for us, which must be better for them, but for some reason the company doesn't want to experience that either. What is your logical explanation for that?

You have the Line AMT's trying to help you get a better agreement, but you keep picking up the 20 lbs sledge hammer and driving the division wedge in deeper. The real strength of your union is asking you to help them, and you are doing all in your power to destroy that strength because you are afraid. And you are only afraid because your Local Leaders and AA Management are using fear to control your emotions. Just start looking at this mess from a less emotional view and try the logical view. While keeping in mind the fact that you have been lied to before by not only Local 514 Leaders but also AA Management.

The Line AMT is not your enemy here! Your enemy is FEAR!
 
Can you prove that will not happen and instead the sky will fall, the sun will not rise, and we will all be sucked in the black hole you believe in?

My prediction is more valid and plausible than yours! You are too thick to see the potential and that is why you always lead this industry backwards everytime we enter negotations.




We probably wouldn't agree on much but here is something I think we can all agree on. If the T/A is rejected, we'll all see who's right and who's wrong about the company capitulating or the judge forcing them to give you what you THINK they will. No excuses then, right.
 
Can you prove that will not happen and instead the sky will fall, the sun will not rise, and we will all be sucked in the black hole you believe in?

My prediction is more valid and plausible than yours! You are too thick to see the potential and that is why you always lead this industry backwards everytime we enter negotations.




We probably wouldn't agree on much but here is something I think we can all agree on. If the T/A is rejected, we'll all see who's right and who's wrong about the company capitulating or the judge forcing them to give you what you THINK they will. No excuses then, right.

Fair enough. But I did not claim the company would capitulate, and never mentioned the Judge forcing anything.
You are a common liar and putting words in my mouth,.

But what is your excuse regarding the claim that if we voted NO last time, we would not have a contract right now?

No Excuses Right?
 
Can you prove that will not happen and instead the sky will fall, the sun will not rise, and we will all be sucked in the black hole you believe in?

My prediction is more valid and plausible than yours! You are too thick to see the potential and that is why you always lead this industry backwards everytime we enter negotations.




We probably wouldn't agree on much but here is something I think we can all agree on. If the T/A is rejected, we'll all see who's right and who's wrong about the company capitulating or the judge forcing them to give you what you THINK they will. No excuses then, right.

So you think that if we give away everything the outcome would be better than everything taken away ? The only people to profit of a yes vote are people enjoying a union scam that will not be affected regardless of the outcome!
 

My prediction is more valid and plausible than yours! You are too thick to see the potential and that is why you always lead this industry backwards everytime we enter negotations.




We probably wouldn't agree on much but here is something I think we can all agree on. If the T/A is rejected, we'll all see who's right and who's wrong about the company capitulating or the judge forcing them to give you what you THINK they will. No excuses then, right.



Fair enough. But I did not claim the company would capitulate, and never mentioned the Judge forcing anything. You are a common liar and putting words in my mouth,.



Help me understand something. If the NO vote wins and the company does an about-face by either forcing the T/A on us instead of the ask after we've rejected it and the Judge has abrogated the contract, or offers us an enhanced contract following the abrogation, that’s not capitulating to us?


Any way you cut it you are implying there’s a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.There are fairy tales like that but most people understand that’s not the real world they live in. All I’ve seen so far is a downward slide in spite of the predictions generated by you and the vote NO pied-pipers. As I said before, if the T/A is rejected, we’ll see who’s right and who’s wrong.


But what is your excuse regarding the claim that if we voted NO last time, we would not have a contract right now?


You have the wrong guy
 
But what is your excuse regarding the claim that if we voted NO last time, we would not have a contract right now?

I don't remember that claim.Where is it
I'd sure hate to have you in the foxhole.
PATHETIC !
 
This is why Informer will vote yes and bamboozal the rest of you. You see In 36mos after DOS he will be making $35.82 as a Welder Crew Chief. Pretty good money for him since he couldn't go anywhere in his station's city and duplicate his cushy job and that hourly rate in 3 years time. He will vote for this TA, I know him, trust me... B)
 
This is why Informer will vote yes and bamboozal the rest of you. You see In 36mos after DOS he will be making $35.82 as a Welder Crew Chief. Pretty good money for him since he couldn't go anywhere in his station's city and duplicate his cushy job and that hourly rate in 3 years time. He will vote for this TA, I know him, trust me... B)

Bamboozaling is what the TWU/AA leadership is doing!!
 
Bamboozaling is what the TWU/AA leadership is doing!!

GenAMT, you will jump on it too, think about it, 36 mos after DOS as an A&P you will be making $35.62, that is before the wage adjustment if the Industry average is above our wages after 36 mos.

You may even get more than $35.62... ;)

Hey and don't forget about the gain sharing plan and the profit sharing, more potential win win for you.... :)
 
The only folks voting yes are the ones that do not believe in Unions.
We could do the same or better if there wasnt a Union on the property.
It takes sacrifice to vote no, but the yes voters will realize that shortly. They are sacrificing not only their future but all currently on payroll.
Sheep need to be led and unfortunately the 99% of local 514 officers are leading all to the slaughter house without putting up a fight!!! fools.
 
The only folks voting yes are the ones that do not believe in Unions.
We could do the same or better if there wasnt a Union on the property.
It takes sacrifice to vote no, but the yes voters will realize that shortly. They are sacrificing not only their future but all currently on payroll.
Sheep need to be led and unfortunately the 99% of local 514 officers are leading all to the slaughter house without putting up a fight!!! fools.

Good luck at finding that $35.00 an hour job over the next 3 years.......
 
GenAMT, you will jump on it too, think about it, 36 mos after DOS as an A&P you will be making $35.62, that is before the wage adjustment if the Industry average is above our wages after 36 mos.

You may even get more than $35.62... ;)

Hey and don't forget about the gain sharing plan and the profit sharing, more potential win win for you.... :)

This company will never offer me a contract that I will vote Yes on!
Just a fact..
 
By the way HSS it is 2ndGENAMT as in second generation AMT and I will not fare nearly as well as my father has due to the Co. and Unions leadership..
 
By the way HSS it is 2ndGENAMT as in second generation AMT and I will not fare nearly as well as my father has due to the Co. and Unions leadership..

Well excuse me not trying to offend.....Maybe you should ask your dad what he thinks you should do, vote no and put yourself at extream risk of entering into a soured economy un-employed and trying to replace your job, or you could vote yes and be making over $35.00 in 36 mos...Bet he will see it my way B)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top