PullUp
Veteran
- May 22, 2010
- 820
- 736
You know what, I'm OK with it - as long as the east attrition is available for east pilots.Your kidding, right? USAPA negotiators aren't even generating the proposals! They're letting the company push a proposal across the table first! Why? God only knows but it probably has to do with the inexperience of the NC. I bet they don't even know how to generate a proposal in the first place. Two and a half years into this and all USAPA has managed to TA is six of the easiest sections in any contract. You know, the Missing in Action and Prisoner of War section and the other handful which are no-brainers. Better sick/vacation/duty rigs. Yeah! Not in this regime! I know, "the company is dragging its feet." Ummm....yeehah! What do you think they were going to do?
Now you've got Seham asking the District Court in AZ to stay the company's suit while the Addington plaintiffs go to the SCOTUS. Assuming Seham is successful, it will be at least five months to hear back from the SCOTUS, and then the company could resume its case. That case will take at least a year, probably longer if one of the parties appeals to the 9th. In the meantime, contract negotiations are parked.
I can live under C2004 during all of this. How's LOA 93 working for you?
Negotiations were slow because of a frivolous lawsuit filed by a gentleman named Addington.
What could happen while court cases were being fought? Certainly, no contract cost could be valued if the seniority list is in limbo.
Now, it seems the company prefers it that way, now that no mergers are pending for the forseeable future.
You said it yourself: The negotiations are parked while the lawyers are doing their thing. So, that is the NAC's fault?
Right.