cleardirect
Veteran
- May 24, 2008
- 6,234
- 9,749
- Banned
- #511
No I did not say I wanted a larger pay raise. what I said was that the east says they will not accept a large pay raise and more contract improvements if it contains the Nicolau. But you seem to think that the west will accept a much smaller raise with no other contract improvements with DOH.CD...
So lets see if I’ve got this straight about what YOU think is fair… you want us to embrace the NIC (derived by the internal rules and processes of ALPA as a negotiation position) in a proposed contract submitted for pilot ratification, which would effectively forever destroy years of an East pilot’s LOS… AND you also want a much larger pay increase for the West pilots because if everyone is brought up to parity it would naturally result in the West pilots obtaining a lesser increase in pay…. Now how can that be… how is it possible if all are brought up to parity… that the West would get less of an increase????? Hummm… what could it be… just what could it be???….. Do you think just maybe because YOU’VE BEEN RECEIVING MORE PAY FOR THE SAME WORK FOR YEARS…. And based upon many West’s postings… are quite pleased about this disparity?
Sorry to be the messenger of bad news CD… but a windfall is in the eyes of the beholder… and in my opinion… hell will freeze over before what you dream about and demand will occur. I honestly believe USAPA will be as fair as what is required by law in developing a proposed list, but I already know it will be rejected without even the slightest review by you and yours. So we are fully prepared for the frivolous suits to begin again.
What possible reason would the west do that? As you said we are getting paid more than you right now. We have min block hour protection in the T/A. We have work rules that we developed and can live with. A new contract will see a small raise the loss of min block hour protection, east pilots coming to PHX and work rules developed by an old BK carrier. usapa has nothing to offer and still wants to destroy the west careers with DOH.
You are right windfall is in the eye of the beholder. Nicolau the neutral thrid party saw DOH as a windfall for the east.
Frivolous is also in the eye of the beholder. A jury of 9 did not think the DFR was frivolous. A judge in the RICO suit did think that usapa's suit was frivolous. Dismissed with prejudice.