CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Nov 13, 2009
- 1,920
- 1,961
Now that is really funny. An ALPA supporter thinking he is using logic and reason to justify USAPA’s actions. That would truly be a first.Feel free to "opine". You won't change my mind. Logic and reason do not support your position.
Was it logic and reason that got USAPA found liable for a DFR?
Was it logic and reason that USAPA that had USAPA pursuing federal RICO charges which were dismissed with prejudice?
Was it logic and reason that caused USAPA to request a trial by jury which then returned a verdict against USAPA in less than two hours?
Was it logic and reason that caused USAPA to put Sully on the witness stand so that he could embarrass himself in demonstrating that he really knew nothing about the DFR case?
Was it logic and reason that sent Bradford out lawyer shopping as he searched for someone who would take his money in return for telling him what he wanted to hear? Was it logic and reason that caused him to reject sound legal counsel that told him he would lose a DFR suit if he pushed DOH under USAPA?
This is really very funny.Was it logic and reason that USAPA that had USAPA pursuing federal RICO charges which were dismissed with prejudice?
Was it logic and reason that caused USAPA to request a trial by jury which then returned a verdict against USAPA in less than two hours?
Was it logic and reason that caused USAPA to put Sully on the witness stand so that he could embarrass himself in demonstrating that he really knew nothing about the DFR case?
Was it logic and reason that sent Bradford out lawyer shopping as he searched for someone who would take his money in return for telling him what he wanted to hear? Was it logic and reason that caused him to reject sound legal counsel that told him he would lose a DFR suit if he pushed DOH under USAPA?