Looks like some in USAPA are jumping off the train before the wreck in January. Maybe they are a little concerned about what the company has planned to crush that little egg timer.
Dear Snapthis,
First, anyone not wanting Cleary in office can try to remove him, either by getting 25% petition of MIGS or get 2/3 BPR members to force a recall vote by all the MIGS. It's fairly easy to do, if you got the votes. I assume you already have 4 West BPR votes to remove him. Whether he's removed or not, USAPA will continue to move on. Like someone else said, USAPA is a product of its membership, not one or two strong-minded pilots. The power lies with the MIGS (until furloughed, I was one). They tell the BPRs what to do. If Cleary gets too far out of line, the BPRs will hear about it. If he doesn't toe their line, he could be removed. So far the only talk of that is from west pilots and the ALPA-types on the east.
While on a break from my furlough job, I stopped by the CLT office and got some insight from both sides of the EVP debate. Small, sparse quarters compared to the old ALPA digs in PIT. The debate between DC and MC is typical union. Hate2fly had it right, two differing ideas on how to get to the same goal. Both have contributed greatly to the cause. Both have their strong points and faults. Their falling-out will not bring down USAPA. Only a successful de-cert can do that.
I don't want a contract that reduces aircraft minimums to 250. That's what Kirby is all about. The West guy who said the company was carrying more aircraft than allowed under the TA was flat wrong. I'm not sure anyone called him on that, but I will now. They are at or maybe one above the limit, depending on how you count. They tested USAPA with going below the West hours limit and USAPA won that battle. You West guys should at least take recognition of that.
From my CLT visit, I learned the newest big grievance battle is over terms of closing of the LAS base. Any West guy, correct me if I got this wrong. The company wants to bring West pilots back to PHX without a displacement bid. That means COs will come back to PHX as COs, even though they have less seniority than PHX FOs who decided to stay FOs in PHX to avoid commuting to LAS to hold CO. I pulled up the West contract and LOA. The company logic, if I got it right, doesn't follow what I read, unless all the LAS flying comes back to PHX. In that case, why are they furloughing, if they got the same amount of flying? So why do I care? The more pilots working, the sooner I get a recall. I've optimistically thought that might be in mid 2013. Now I'm not so sure, especially with Kirby. I won't have a vote on Kirby, but I'll have a vote on USAPA if it comes to that. I doubt it will.
Sincerely,
Dogandsuds