SparrowHawk
Veteran
- Nov 30, 2009
- 7,824
- 2,707
Clown, you can't spell. Franke loved the illiterate.
Guess that's why you are his new best friend.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clown, you can't spell. Franke loved the illiterate.
Yeah, the question was...what part of binding arbitration do you not get?
Forming an entirely new union to renege on an agreement, how did that work? The nic is inevitable, and you wasted so many years because the east was so greedy that they wouldn't honor their agreement.
1690 posts and you repeat the same mantra every week. Can you please stop. We know your position on final and binding. Come up with something new
Then again, you may be somewhat deficient in the literary department.
Hope you enjoy your lottery ticket in the employment line.
The employment line, sounds like good news to me. It sure sounds a lot better than the unemployment line.
USAPA supporters, real men of genius.Jeeze, what is wrong with you? Your reading comprehension is becoming just as bad as some of these so-called pilots who call themselves of the west.
So do you think Hummel has a chance of brokering a settlement between the groups?
IMO the key would be forging a deal that would allow both sides to "Save Face". That means everyone has to bend a bit. Do that and maybe Doug will take you to a nice place in Scottsdale. Maybe a round of golf at the Gainey Ranch, PBR might not be served HERE
You are still completely wrong scab, try againDidn't say that. I said that there must be a separate vote, one for the east and one for the west, each of whom must ratify separately any merged proposal, per the original "agreement". Vote, not negotiation. One, a four letter word, the other, eleven. Did the transition agreement change?
Jeeze, what is wrong with you? Your reading comprehension is becoming just as bad as some of these so-called pilots who call themselves of the west.
You are still completely wrong scab, try again
Oh Claxsucker, you are a funny clownClown, you can't spell. Franke loved the illiterate.
Didn't say that. I said that there must be a separate vote, one for the east and one for the west, each of whom must ratify separately any merged proposal, per the original "agreement". Vote, not negotiation. One, a four letter word, the other, eleven. Did the transition agreement change?
As I have said, you must first follow the procedure laid out in the transition agreement, where a completed merged contract must first be negotiated with three different parties (two pilots groups and management), then both pilot groups, east and west, must individually ratify in a separate vote, such completed merged agreement.
Oh Claxsucker, you are a funny clown
Can someone kindly explain why we've resorted to using the pejorative "Scab" when referring to others with an opposing point of view?
While I don't pretend to know all of the nuances of the current situation, I find calling someone a scab as offensive if not more so then using the "N-Word" as a descriptor of another.
I was 8 years old the first time I went "Down on the picket line" with my Dad. Funny thing was all the other men (IBT) were busy hiding their Playboy Magazines from a very curious set of eyes. But I learned a lot that day about what it meant to be "union". Much of it I rejected for me personally but I've made it 57 years now and I've never crossed a picket line or called anyone a "Scab"
When you call your brethren "Scabs" you disrespect every single union man who has gone "down on the picket line". An action that in some parts of the country could get you killed in the '20's and 30's.
You should all be ashamed of yourselves.
We are all ashamed, especially the scabs (not that there actually are more than a hand full and they were scabs long before Doug came along).