Tiger 1050
Veteran
- Aug 4, 2007
- 882
- 12
Your post accurately reflects your, and apparently the wests total ignorance about the feeling and resolve from the east pilots. I am around number 50 on BOTH lists and would never vote yes on a contract that included the nic list. REGARDLESS of the hourly rate. That doesn't make one an idiot. It makes one principled for standing up for the profession and the seniority that each and every pilot, ON BOTH SIDES, has earned and has a right to. Like when you bid your blocks, vacation, vacancies etc.... You know, seniority. The thing that our entire careers are based on.
Maybe you do have resolve. Albeit misplaced but nonetheless resolve...
The principle you speak of...? Is this the same principle the east was using in trying to staple the AWA pilots? You guys need to understand that seniority is what you bring with you to the merger. Whatever #50 could hold on May 18th 2005 is what #50 should hold today. Length of service has nothing to do with our situation (this is a new company). You guys seem to be using seniority and length of service as one in the same. They are not the same! This is why you cannot understand how Nicolau's award fair.
To pass up a decent close to your career regarding pay and benefits because of you weak "principle" is a rather obtuse position...
Good day little children