MCI AFL-CIO
Advanced
- Sep 29, 2003
- 151
- 0
Now don't go twisting facts and leaving part of the conversation out.Decision 2004 said:
I said "AMFA is not the answer to your seniority issue", and you not only know this to be fact, you purposely attempt to deceive the readers.
Now we know your character better also
Dave, Correct me if I'm wrong? You said in Kansas City, while answering the question involving TWA senority, "AMFA is not the answer to the problems we face as AMT's?"
Pertainingto TWA senority, you stated that," when the time comes to start negotiations, the National will send surveys to poll each local as to what each local would hope to secure in negotiations, you said, KC might want to re establish their senority, as number 1, then you said, the national would ask, lets say Tulsa, and Tulsa might want to have more vacation time, You said Tulsa would win because there are more members at Tulsa.
Am I right Dave? If so Dave, Does this blow out the window where we are told that AMFA will listen to eadch member? to each local? This is nothingwe dont already have Dave, We report to our local and in turn they respond to the international, and try to negotiate for the members, where is AMFA different?
Dave, always trying to belittle ,