We still have separate contracts and can have separate negotiations. So two locals and two presidents. Isn't that what Bob wanted?
You are beyond help........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We still have separate contracts and can have separate negotiations. So two locals and two presidents. Isn't that what Bob wanted?
Has anybody heard the lastest, the twu intl exec.wants one local for line maint. WTF!!
How is this going to benefit US?
How are we going to have a say at are station?
How will we vote on anything?
How and where will are meetings be?
We will have no say at are stations WTF!!!!
this idea was first thought about @ 9 years ago amongst some local presidents with the local being in DFW of course.
This plan was concocted by the IEC, who is on the IEC? NOT ONE OFFICE HOLDING AMT, so Fleet service Clerks and three Ex-maint Presidents decided whats to happen to Line AMTs and Title II.
The Line Maint Presidents had no say in this.
Hopefully they rethink what they are doing, I like the idea of a single Local but IMO this plan is a deliberate attempt to make things worse. At the next round of negotiations there could be just two AMTs and 11 Fleet service Clerks deciding what we vote on.
Sounds like when the IAM tried separate districts for mechanics and rampers at NWA. It failed.
where this local giong to be located ? what if bob or paul or some other person gets voted in do they have to move?
This plan was concocted by the IEC, who is on the IEC? NOT ONE OFFICE HOLDING AMT, so Fleet service Clerks and three Ex-maint Presidents decided whats to happen to Line AMTs and Title II.
The Line Maint Presidents had no say in this.
Hopefully they rethink what they are doing, I like the idea of a single Local but IMO this plan is a deliberate attempt to make things worse. At the next round of negotiations there could be just two AMTs and 11 Fleet service Clerks deciding what we vote on.
Think about it guys. This is the Internationals way of getting rid of the local presidents that do not conform to there way of thinking or what they want.where this local giong to be located ? what if bob or paul or some other person gets voted in do they have to move?
That's exactly what I was thinkingThink about it guys. This is the Internationals way of getting rid of the local presidents that do not conform to there way of thinking or what they want.
Really? I thought this was your idea that you were pushing no less than 2 months ago? Open your mouth, give them the general idea, and presto, the TWU jumps at the chance to "smoke and mirror" change to prevent the membership from leaving and getting a new union.
This is just the next "appeasement" after the shaft that James C Little has offered in the past.
It doesn't matter this time though, AMFA will be representing us at AA soon enough.
After this debacle the TWU is going to pull we should see an increase of cards. Wait until the details come out. One line President? Really.
LOL, I guess you best be careful what you wish and turncoat for huh Bob. You never know how it may come back and bite you in the end. That Luis concoction not so good now?This plan was concocted by the IEC, who is on the IEC? NOT ONE OFFICE HOLDING AMT, so Fleet service Clerks and three Ex-maint Presidents decided whats to happen to Line AMTs and Title II.
The Line Maint Presidents had no say in this.
Hopefully they rethink what they are doing, I like the idea of a single Local but IMO this plan is a deliberate attempt to make things worse. At the next round of negotiations there could be just two AMTs and 11 Fleet service Clerks deciding what we vote on.