And both have relevant Socialist (Labor) parties, in this country Unionists refute Socialist ideology, they refute the roots of Labor Unions and have never made a serious attempt at forming a Labor party like most advanced democracies have. We just have two Capitalist Parties, the Democrats and Republicans. In England they had the Liberals and the Tories, same situation as us, The liberal Party of England was like our Democratic party, "we feel your pain but we cant (wont) do anything about it". The Tories were like our Republican Party "We know you are suffering but its Gods will". Both parties serve the interests of the rich. But in England and most of Europe they developed relevant Socialist (Labor) Parties to which most of the Unions are heavily aligned. The Capitalist Parties generally still rule but normally coalitions are formed and labor does much better than they do here where Labor alligned themselves with the Democrats who as often as not forget what labor is looking for and bows to the same masters as the Republicans. Europeans generally require a majority vote to take office, meaning that the winner has to get the majority of the votes cast, not just the most votes of all the candidates, much more Democratic than we have.TWU informer said:
If we had UNIONS like Canada and Europe we would have those laws you desire. They shut the country down when needed, laws or no laws, they show their force.
In the early part of the 1900's Robert Tressell came out with a book that had even more impact in England than Uncle Toms Cabin had in the US. The book was "The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists". You wont find it in many US bookstores but you can get it online.