MetalMover
Veteran
- Sep 16, 2013
- 3,543
- 2,410
not at all....as i am not based in TUL...dfw gen said:again no insult intended.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not at all....as i am not based in TUL...dfw gen said:again no insult intended.
I'm thinking DWH will get even bigger to do overnight phase inspections and TUL will shrink even more. As I understand it USAir Does phase inspections on all the lite C instead of doing the whole check at once.CactUS4Ever said:The Company will do whats best for The Company. If there giving us a Raise Delta plus 7 it will be at a cost. I dont see them closing Tulsa but I do see them giving it a nice trim
yep. I have seen US military and UPS 767s during heavy C-checks.... the cargo system is as just as a PIA as seats and carpet. and they still have sidewalls. no PSU or bins though.lineguy43 said:
On the lav you are correct. However, I have worked both passenger and cargo with freighters they have cargo locks and cargo handling systems that break all the time. Another thing is cargo birds usually sit over the weekends this is not a good thing. Planes like to fly when they sit for long periods they usually develop leaks either fuel or hydraulic happens a LOT so to say cargo planes are easier to maintain is wrong.
Delta had the same problem for a while. Lost United's painting contract because management simply didn't know how to write the contract.Overspeed said:We lost FedEx because management didn't know how to run AA MRO properly. Customers like dour work and were willing to pay for the quality. Allegiant and others left because AA didn't know how to bill
Well the justification is cargo outfits have smaller overhead and make a lot of money, because there is not as much compitition in the cargo business as travel.Bob Owens said:I've worked both as well. There is Zero justification for us making so much less than our peers at UPS and FED EX. I recall when Fed ex made less than us.
How is that justification?bigjets said:Well the justification is cargo outfits have smaller overhead and make a lot of money, because there is not as much compitition in the cargo business as travel.
Kind of like how WNBA players don't make what NBA players make.
But on the flip side didn't AA just win an airline cargo award.
You are wasting your time. I have already tried to explain to the forum patrons that AA and UPS have a different business model and a different cost strategy.bigjets said:Well the justification is cargo outfits have smaller overhead and make a lot of money, because there is not as much compitition in the cargo business as travel.
Kind of like how WNBA players don't make what NBA players make.
But on the flip side didn't AA just win an airline cargo award.
AA has a different "business model and cost strategy" (whatever that actually means) than UAL or DAL or SWA or Fed Ex as well. The fact is we sell heavy Turbine A&P maint labor. And we sell that labor in the same market as our peers at UPS or FED EX, the planes are the same with modifications to the cabins, thats pretty much all. The engines, wheels, systems, avionics etc are for the most part exactly the same whether they use it for freight or Passengers.La Li Lu Le Lo said:You are wasting your time. I have already tried to explain to the forum patrons that AA and UPS have a different business model and a different cost strategy.
Tell them a person working at Eagle works on aircraft just like they do, is required to be licensed just as they are, and has the same responsibility so should get the same pay and watch them go off.
The difference of course is Eagle has a different business model and cost structure.
You are trying to explain a fact that they either don't understand or don't want to hear.
Bob being one of the more intelligent patrons you can guess which side of the fence he sits on.....
Well technically that freighter could be converted into a PAX and their liability for their work would still be there.swamt said:Not to mention all the lives and humans we are responsible for until that aircraft is scrapped. Packages can easily be replaced where human lives can not.
Bob you know exactly what it means.Bob Owens said:AA has a different "business model and cost strategy" (whatever that actually means).
By "WE" I assume you mean the TWU. TWU sells it on your behalf...... Do YOU think TWU is charging a fair price for your skill? That is the only real question here.Bob Owens said:The fact is we sell heavy Turbine A&P maint labor.
Don't forget about the "lives" of the pilots and the potential lives of those on the ground swamt.swamt said:Not to mention all the lives and humans we are responsible for until that aircraft is scrapped. Packages can easily be replaced where human lives can not.
didnt they just lay off in Tulsa?AA767JET said:Any new talk/rumors of an increase in the AMT headcount in TULE ??
As per past practices AA will probably maintain or increase the headcount until the jcba is passed, then who knows what will happen.AA767JET said:Any new talk/rumors of an increase in the AMT headcount in TULE ??