Teamsters filed at USAir for representation

[Tim Nelson]

They may feel sorry for him, dunno. He may have threatened them to do something for him after he realized he gave his own work group the kiss of death.
He isnt pro management but since he isnt the brightest bulb in the box, he gets exploited. Not that we should feel sorry for him.

 

[TRAVIS]

AND I PAY DUES FOR THIS ABUSE AND MORE... I WANT MY MONEY BACK LOL

 

[Tim Nelson]

Travis,
Just think, you wont even know who you will be paying dues to with the association. The association will redetermine representational roadmaps every 12 months.
The biggest rumor is that after it is certified it will distribute the twu to the mx and the iam to ramp.

 

[737823]

Tim,
Do you think the pathetic T/A at UA will come up during the association vote at AA/US? It seems US fleet has done nothing, 142 asked for a release but so far nothing in 141. No ask for a release, no strike vote, nothing so far. Is 141 focusing their attention on UA?

Josh

 

[700UW]

Travis,
700 is compensated. He does alot of jc dirty work and gets compensation forbeing the iam front man on all these pages.

Travis, no problem. It is his job to be on here. Btw, he did a lousy job representing people as well. When he was an organizer he couldnt be found. He didnt even know the iam filed cards short at usairways. He was so naive that frieberger immediately snatched him to represent his division. When he agreed to toss his cleaners out on the streets he put in his bid to transfer. But he was so naive that he didnt realize what he signed and got laid off anyways. He later got the gig from his buddy paying him a modest compensation to tell lies and smear everything non iam establishment. He is everything wrong with labor

They may feel sorry for him, dunno. He may have threatened them to do something for him after he realized he gave his own work group the kiss of death.
He isnt pro management but since he isnt the brightest bulb in the box, he gets exploited. Not that we should feel sorry for him.

Ah Tim you know slander on the internet is an offense you can be sued for, so why the lies and slander?

First of all I am not compensated by anyone to post here, you wont find my name on an IAMAW, DL 142 of LL 1725 LM-2 since 2005, thats a facts so thats lie number one.

Lie #2 I was never a paid organizer, I assisted in the Fleet Campaign, you can ask Rusk, Russo and Carr, I also was on the UA CSA campaign, never full time.

Lie#3 Freighberger and I hated each other, never worked for him nor did he pick me for anything.

Lie#4 We never agreed to toss Utility to the street, our CBA was abrogated in 2005, and the judge made us vote on the final offer which gave the company the ability to outsource line cleaning, lavatory and water service.

Lie#5 You can ask any of my members about my level of representation and skill, which blows yours away. How about the $15 milllion arbitration

Lie#6 Never compensated for anything and I went to PHL as a Stock Clerk and left US shortly after, then went to work for Freightliner then Philip Morris, then school and run my own small business.

So Tim keep up your lies and I will call you out every single time.

You really should read up on slander and the internet, as all you do is lie about me.

 

[Tim Nelson]

Josh, iam141 did file at usairways. It is too early to tell but thus far they are sayong all the right things just like they did at united.
Presently, they are blaming the united membership and insisting that facebook lies destroyed the anti labor ta.
Essentually, they have done what 700 repeatedly does, blame the membership for the grossly unfair actions of the iam.
700 himself is doing a great job swaying votes for the ibt since he holds the iam unaccountable and blames the membership for his own anti labor actions and the anti labor actions of sito and 700's other buddies.

 

[Anomaly]

Ah Tim you know slander on the internet is an offense you can be sued for, so why the lies and slander?

First of all I am not compensated by anyone to post here, you wont find my name on an IAMAW, DL 142 of LL 1725 LM-2 since 2005, thats a facts so thats lie number one.

Lie #2 I was never a paid organizer, I assisted in the Fleet Campaign, you can ask Rusk, Russo and Carr, I also was on the UA CSA campaign, never full time.

Lie#3 Freighberger and I hated each other, never worked for him nor did he pick me for anything.

Lie#4 We never agreed to toss Utility to the street, our CBA was abrogated in 2005, and the judge made us vote on the final offer which gave the company the ability to outsource line cleaning, lavatory and water service.

Lie#5 You can ask any of my members about my level of representation and skill, which blows yours away. How about the $15 milllion arbitration

Lie#6 Never compensated for anything and I went to PHL as a Stock Clerk and left US shortly after, then went to work for Freightliner then Philip Morris, then school and run my own small business.

So Tim keep up your lies and I will call you out every single time.

You really should read up on slander and the internet, as all you do is lie about me.

Hmmmm, 700UW, Tim was also part of the IAM, and maybe still is? I don't know him. He was a very vocal supporter of the Machinists during the campaign on the ramp not too long ago. The question now seems to be; Who has a greater reason to lie??

I would say you are against the ropes 7000....

Start dancing your way out of this one

 

[737823]

Tim,
I watched the comment videos in 141 YouTube and you are right. Seems the district doesn't like people exchanging information and learning about the agreement. As you said, they seem to forget people actually read the CBA before voting and can see why it's awful agreement.

http://youtu.be/mK0MAn0cHVk

Josh

 

[Tim Nelson]

Josh, during the last eboard meeting, they discussed how to get the social media from informing the members about the ta.
They warned all of the members to stay off their computers and only listen to delaney.
Everything blew up when we intercepted some key documents where we exposed delaney and the intl iam lie.
Unfortunately, they threatened some local chairpersons and forced them to denounce any informational networking without sito at the top.

 

[Tim Nelson]

Of course, 700 was silent on the ua ta but was prepared to blame the membership if it voted it in. Gosh forbid 700's apparent employer would be held responsible for the loss of thousands of more jobs. regards,

 

[700UW]

How about you demanding AGC pay and wanting over $100,000 a year to be an organizer?

 

[Tim Nelson]

700, im not one claiming the association is the way to go so the onus is upon you to make the case. Isnt it true that the ibt is the only union out of the twu, iam, and ibt that can be certified after single carrier since the twu and iam already waived all certifying powers and rights to the unknown association?

 

[pjirish317]

700, im not one claiming the association is the way to go so the onus is upon you to make the case. Isnt it true that the ibt is the only union out of the twu, iam, and ibt that can be certified after single carrier since the twu and iam already waived all certifying powers and rights to the unknown association?

Tim,

Please elaborate on this. What I understand, and IMO, the IAM and the TWU BOTH HAVE TO AGREE TO SINGLE CARRIER STATUS, one cannot agree for both. So what are you trying to say here?

 

[Tim Nelson]

Pj,
The situation at fleet is different. We will have to vote for the association. But it is the same ending that the mechanic group will have if they keep the iam.
As far as single carrier, the iam, not in any case, can call for it since it will never be certified. Only one union triggers single carrier. The association, through the twu already entered agreement with usairways to do so. If the association didnt exist then the iam could have argued against single carrier.

 

[pjirish317]

tim,

the association was created AFTER the TWU agreed to what they agreed to. The TWU, IMO, cannot call for single carrier without the IAM's consent because of the association. I think you are wrong here, but hey, I may be way off also, I guess only time will tell who's proven right in this case. But just think about it for a second. If I am correct, and both the TWU and the IAM have to agree to single carrier, how much leverage do we have at the table now? The IAM can hold up single carrier status, throwing a big wrench in the works for this "fast tracked" merger. Why would you even put doubt out there? Because you always have to be right? You alone do not know what the whole of fleet wants/needs.