Kev3188
Veteran
Weren't you the one that misread it, and wasted a ton of bandwidth over it?WorldTraveler said:Weren't you the one that talked about the hangars that NW got rid of?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weren't you the one that misread it, and wasted a ton of bandwidth over it?WorldTraveler said:Weren't you the one that talked about the hangars that NW got rid of?
Dawg does own him right now. He was also successful in getting the two twins in a full blown tiff-tiff. It's just like watching 2-3 year olds fighting over the ball in the playground on recess. I also see the pot is still calling other kettles black. Man, you just gotta LUV this stuff. Robbed, don't let it bother you, we all know that the twins have to use words and verbiage to make himself feel like he is in a superior position or authority and talks down to all others, even others that have to act and talk to people the exact same way, hence the "twins". When he used the "son" word to you, it made him feel in a position of authority as if he was scolding his son and putting him in his place, so typical of him...LD3 said:Don't get upset robbed, we all know that WT treats everyone like dumb a$$es, but right know Dawg owns him...
swamt it is in a tough spot. You should be more kind to him.I'm so glad you are concerned about me, hypocrite.
WorldTraveler said:uh, you might want to check the data that shows that NW was outsourcing 61% of its maintenance spend when they shut their doors; it went as high as 74% in 2007. wanna guess what took place right before?
okay?
DL's rate of maintenance outsourcing jumped from 26 to 40% between 2009 and 2010; 2009 was the last year NW reported as a standalone company separate from DL's stats while 2010 was the first year DL's numbers include NW.
and why is that okay?
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2013%2012%20Month%20Documents/Employees%20and%20Productivity/Individual%20Employee%20Data/Delta%20Airlines%20Employee%20Data%20and%20Analysis.htm
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2013%2012%20Month%20Documents/Employees%20and%20Productivity/Individual%20Employee%20Data/Northwest%20Airlines%20Employee%20Data%20and%20Analysis.htm
It amazes me that Delta is slowly growing to 50% and that is suppose to be okay....Kev3188 said:So now we're using a YOY increase in outsourcing of "only" 14% as a good thing?
Now wonder this country is so f'ed...
WorldTraveler said:holy cow.
Did you not grasp the fact that the reason why DL's rate of maintenance outsourcing jumped was because it absorbed NW who outsourced 60% of its maintenance at the time of the merger?
okay and why isn't Delta bringing that work in-house
DL had 25% before the merger, NW had 60% and the final entity ended up with 40% which hasn't moved much since the merger.
25% to 40% is a hell of a jump. Merger or not, and its not going down.....but is still going up. 3 years after the merger but outsourcing % is still trending up doesn't mean its just the fault of the merger
Weren't you the one that talked about the hangars that NW got rid of?
And? IS all work done in a hangar? no its not.
thousands.700UW said:You can post your stupid money statistics as much as you want, there is more of a cost and more components outsourced at US and other airlines.
Both AA and US do more in-house Airfram overhaul then any other US based airline.
And DL outsources ALL their own AO and most of their mods.
So if DL did that work in-house, how many more jobs would be added?
yes.Kev3188 said:Weren't you the one that misread it, and wasted a ton of bandwidth over it?
WorldTraveler said:misread or not, NW sold off much of its maintenance capabilities and DL has not replaced it; thus the current average rate of outsourcing reflects the fact that NW outsourced more maintenance at the time of the merger than any legacy airline at the time.
huh? No they didn't. MSP still has a fair amount of back shop space. They could handle V2500 overhauls (and they have a 70K test cell). I believe the landing gear shop is still there also. As for the smaller things Delta could do them in ATL by just incensing staffing. Delta doesn't have a single shop that is at capacity that I know off. Even the engine shop is well under capacity.
DL uses its facilities to operate its own maintenance and to insource what they can do to make money; 700 would never understand the business case behind outsourcing lower cost work to outsource in order to insource work that is more valuable but that is what DL has done... .and why DL has the lowest maintenance costs for its own fleet compared to other carriers.
All this "lower level" work you keep talking about is what keeps companies like AAR and TIMCO going.
Maybe you could quit copying everything Delta executives said during BK and learn more about what your talking about.
DL uses its insourced maintenance capabilities to reduce its own costs.
and provide more jobs for DL people than they could have if they did the work on their own
huh? want to try that again?
The excuse is they don't want to "flex" the work force up and down.robbedagain said:IF DL insources their work... then explain why in the flippin world are they sending planes to 3rd world nations in ASIA for Interior work? Talk about a waste of fuel for cheap crap done. Itd be a helluva lot in fuel cost savings alone if they do it in ATL or MSP or in the US period
WorldTraveler said:DL outsources work that they can get done for less compared to the revenues they can gain from using the same facilities to do insourcing.
this is also bs. The MRO bays have been doing more Delta work lately than MRO work. They were going to have multiple lines for the M88/M90 cockpit mods(but most of the staffing was going to be contractors.) but that looks like they aren't doing those mods anymore.
DL doesn't have facilities to do all of its own maintenance in part because NW sold off much of its maintenance infrastructure.
also BS. Airframe overhauls would require hangar space, most back shop work will fit into existing infrastructure.
DL recognizes maintenance insourcing as a lucrative part of its business; they can make 25% profit margins or better (1 dollar in profits for every 4 dollars in price) for component and engine overhauls.
but turn down opportunities to gain even more money by not doing more work in-house.
before you lay into DL for its overseas maintenance work, would you like to tell me how AA got the 772 that just returned from HKG and a cabin mod - the same thing DL sent its aircraft to Asia for?
hmm AA sends its 777s to HEACO for cabin mods and overhauls.......good point. Now care to remind me where they rest of the fleet's overhauls are done? AAR? no....PEMCO....no......hmmmm AA's hangar in Mexico? nope not it.
Oh thats right...they do them all in house.
The aircraft ferried over without passengers. That is a known and fully expected part of the process of doing maintenance on the other side of the planet.
okay?
The cost of the ferry, crew, and the whole nine yards has got to be less than the savings an airline gets for sending the work over there. I don't have to like it to know that is the way it works.
but thats false thats the problem. You've been told why they work is sent over there. It isn't cost.
if you don't want to be called "son" then don't go throwing dirt about something that you not only are clueless about but also for things about which AA and other carriers do the exact same thing as DL.