Dog Wonder
Veteran
Sanity requires a sense of humor.Still not nice. It diminishes you as a poster and person.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sanity requires a sense of humor.Still not nice. It diminishes you as a poster and person.
SparrowHawk said:When a nation decides to engage in an act of war sans a formal declaration then that nation is no different morally than ISIS.
Or it that to hard to grasp?
Dog Wonder said:Sanity requires a sense of humor.
Then I guess the COTUS is wrong too. Unless you're going to use Article Six as justification to go to war under the UN or one of the 166 other treaties we've signed.777 fixer said:
Your ignorance never ceases to amaze me.
SparrowHawk said:Then I guess the COTUS is wrong too. Unless you're going to use Article Six as justification to go to war under the UN or one of the 166 other treaties we've signed.
The perversion of Article Six has been used to justify our action for every war since WWII. The Liar in Chief has admitted his actions in Syria. Even the Liar in Chief's National Security Adviser Tony Blinken tacitly admitted the Obama Administration was following much of G W Bush's strategy now.
So now enlighten me as to why I'm ignorant of? T Jefferson warned about foreign alliances then, Ron Paul does now. Given the unrest and number of dead US Soldiers it would seem that perhaps a return to a more non interventionist approach may be in our best interests.
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”
SparrowHawk said:Any Questions as to why a policy of non intervention is abetter path
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sI0etqzbqDM
777 fixer said:
Another thing. Please stop pretending to be an expert in the Constitution. No one one here is. If we were we would'nt be arguing about it on a message board.
In addition, do not say an American pilot dropping a bomb on an MRAP full of ISIS fighters who probably either cut someones head off or executed prisoners is the moral equivalent of what those ISIS fighters did. It is not.
eolesen said:Clearly, Dr. Paul's thinking evolved...
SparrowHawk said:
First and foremost I do NOT take orders from you or anyone else for that matter. So I will speak my mind whether it appeals to you or not I can't control how you react, nor do I desire to.
I have studied the COTUS more then most less than others. Expert? I'll allow others to describe. Sounds to me like you don't care for or didn't know what Article Six was all about.
One of the most glaring perversions of Article Six was the obscure portion of the UN Charter Reagan used that America was exercising its right to self defense as defined by Article 51 of the UN charter. to bomb Libya.
Turned out to be the best shots ever fired in anger at another nation as it pretty much kept Khadafi Duck in line for close to 30 years until the Liar in Chief stuck his nose in.
SparrowHawk said:.
One of the most glaring perversions of Article Six was the obscure portion of the UN Charter Reagan used that America was exercising its right to self defense as defined by Article 51 of the UN charter. to bomb Libya.
Turned out to be the best shots ever fired in anger at another nation as it pretty much kept Khadafi Duck in line for close to 30 years until the Liar in Chief stuck his nose in.
eolesen said:Clearly, Dr. Paul's thinking evolved...
777 fixer said:
Wow, you managed to contradict yourself in the same paragraph.
SparrowHawk said:
Not really. The fact that the law of unintended consequences rose up when Colonel Khadafi's daughter was killed by an errant bomb could never have been anticipated. Sometimes luck intervene's as it did here.IF, we had stuck to the original terms of the COTUS the Libya raid would have required a vote in Congress.