Today an ALPA MEC wrote the following information to his constituents:
Just to bring you up to date:
1. We have decided to not to get into the details of the Scope Relief proposals and counterproposals because negotiations are still in progress, and when a TA is reached between the company and the NC the final product will come back to the MEC for our review and, if accepted, will then go out to you for membership ratification.
As an overview, however, the company is basically asking for scope relief to allow GECAS to sell the CRJ's slated for PSA and the EMB's slated for MDA to an US Airways Express Participating Affiliate (Mesa, for example) if GECAS decides not to sell them to USAirways Inc.
We can't make GECAS lend us the money to buy these airplanes no matter what we do with scope, as their decision appears to be credit worthiness driven and that, at the moment, is not our strong suit. So if they decide not to lend us the money for some or all of these SJ deliveries, then the company wants to be able to capture the revenue stream by those SJ's being sold to our Affiliates. Why is that so important? Because that revenue stream makes up a significant portion of the revenue that we told the ATSB we would deliver under our Plan of Reorganization (POR), and if it goes away we are going to have even bigger problems meeting our ATSB loan covenants.
And if GECAS does pull some or all deliveries, and if the company is successful in persuading GECAS to sell these airplanes to our Affiliates, then we can put these airplanes under our existing J4J's program and get 50% of all these new jobs for our furloughed pilots. Yes, it's not as good as 100% that we now have at MDA if GECAS would continue to lend us money to put airplanes there, but it's a whole lot better than 0% jobs if GECAS sells these airplanes to a United Express carrier (and United wants these EMB 170's real bad for their Dulles feed).
So the real "quid," or return, to the pilot group may be what I described above, and, in my view, the company thus realizes that scope relief is in our own best interest as well. We did, however, appear to be able to secure some "quality of life" issues that we have been hammering away at the company about, and, again only as an overview, these include:
1. Negotiations on "Tag Along" rights to sell our stock at the same price that RSA sells theirs.
2. A Commuter Policy to allow using a back-up flight to commute (and thus if you miss on both your primary and back-up, you are not exposed to a punitive situation. MDA already has this in their Agreement).
3. Participation in an Interline Jump Seat program (that is currently in its trial stage).
4. Participation in a Trip Construction working group to improve the "quality and efficiency" of our trip pairings.
5. Company participation in and payment for Alternate Security Access for all pilots at their respective domiciles.
Regards,
USA320Pilot