777 fixer said:
And who ordered troops into Iraq in 2003? That would be GWB. The mess there is on his head. Just like how Vietnam was on LBJ head.
Who ordered Operation Desert Fox in 1998 and the issue was WMD's before Bush.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
777 fixer said:
And who ordered troops into Iraq in 2003? That would be GWB. The mess there is on his head. Just like how Vietnam was on LBJ head.
777 fixer said:
What about the Canadian border?
That's totally and completely irrelevant. Bill Clinton did not order the invasion of Iraq. That would be George Bush. You cannot spin your way around that fact.delldude said:
Who ordered Operation Desert Fox in 1998 and the issue was WMD's before Bush.
delldude said:
Tango's have been caught before crossing...what's your point?
signals said:I tend to disagree. Canadian borders are tighter and there is a higher cooperation between the US and Canadian government. The Mexican border has miles of HOLES, for lack of a better word.
And Mexico doesn't give a rat's @$$ about their citizens crossing into the US,
Asinine point there!
You are partially correct. Cooperation exists, but to say the border is tighter than the US-Mexico border is incorrect.signals said:I tend to disagree. Canadian borders are tighter and there is a higher cooperation between the US and Canadian government.
Glenn Quagmire said:You are partially correct. Cooperation exists, but to say the border is tighter than the US-Mexico border is incorrect.
"Next, he turns to the U.S-Canada divide, mentioning the 1999 case of Ahmed Ressam who would have become "the millennium bomber," if not for an astute US Customs agent in Washington state. Here, as Tussing sees it, is the crux of the problem: "We found over time that he was able to do what he was to do because of the comparatively liberal immigration and asylum laws that exist today in Canada, which allowed him a safe haven. Which allowed him a planning area. Which allowed him an opportunity to build bombs. Which allowed him an opportunity to arrange his logistics." He pauses. "This is not to say that Canada's laws are wrong, but they are different from ours."
A Government Accountablity Office report, he adds, claims that "the risk of terrorist activity is high along the northern border." Of that 4,000-mile border between the two countries, he adds, "only 32 of those miles are categorized as what we say are acceptable levels of control."
As what Tussing calls the "coup de grâce" to his argument for reinforcements of every sort along that border, he quotes Alan Bersin, former director of Customs and Border Protection: "In terms of the terrorist threat, it's more commonly accepted that the most significant threat comes from the north," not the south."
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/02/US-canada-border-constitution-free-zone
Why should we care, Libtards don't!delldude said:
Are they smuggling nukes across uninhabited regions ?
You are too worried about immigrants getting jobs to care.southwind said:Why should we care, !
777 fixer said:That's totally and completely irrelevant. Bill Clinton did not order the invasion of Iraq. That would be George Bush. You cannot spin your way around that fact.
10/31/98 Clinton signs the Iraq Liberation Act. Regime change becomes official US policy
Yeah, I live in Upstate NY and have never been to Canada...Bwhahaha! I know that just at the 1000 Islands entry, many a drug smuggler has been caught. The biggest hole is on the St. Regis reservation, but they are tightening it down.777 fixer said:You've never been to the US-Canada border have you? For starters it's the longest undefended international border in the world. And compared to the US-Mexico border security measures are light. There are no miles and miles of fence, drones flying overhead, Border Patrol helicopters with FLIR flying around, or agents in SUV or ATV driving around. I'm rather sure this fact is not lost on certain groups.
So it;s not an asinine point. It's a legitimate one.
Point taken. Still the millennium bomber was stopped even by luck.Glenn Quagmire said:You are partially correct. Cooperation exists, but to say the border is tighter than the US-Mexico border is incorrect.
"Next, he turns to the U.S-Canada divide, mentioning the 1999 case of Ahmed Ressam who would have become "the millennium bomber," if not for an astute US Customs agent in Washington state. Here, as Tussing sees it, is the crux of the problem: "We found over time that he was able to do what he was to do because of the comparatively liberal immigration and asylum laws that exist today in Canada, which allowed him a safe haven. Which allowed him a planning area. Which allowed him an opportunity to build bombs. Which allowed him an opportunity to arrange his logistics." He pauses. "This is not to say that Canada's laws are wrong, but they are different from ours."
A Government Accountablity Office report, he adds, claims that "the risk of terrorist activity is high along the northern border." Of that 4,000-mile border between the two countries, he adds, "only 32 of those miles are categorized as what we say are acceptable levels of control."
As what Tussing calls the "coup de grâce" to his argument for reinforcements of every sort along that border, he quotes Alan Bersin, former director of Customs and Border Protection: "In terms of the terrorist threat, it's more commonly accepted that the most significant threat comes from the north," not the south."
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/02/US-canada-border-constitution-free-zone