joe mechanic
Member
Millions if not billions of dollars spent on finding a cure for cancer and they have nothing to show for it. They should stop looking.
Your argument holds no water. There has to be security at the airports. How do you suggest they do their job with out being invasive? There are quite a few arguments I can think of against the current processes of the TSA but not having stopped a terrorist is not one of them. Given that there has only been one instance in the last 10 years, it is not like terrorists are popping up all over the place to be stopped.
Security is invasive. The level of security seems to be related to the level of invasiveness. Tell us how you want it done.
Mr Paul knew the rules of the game. If he does not want to play, he could take a car or train. Sucks to be him.
Sir, you seem to be a proponent of the Constitution yet here you support relinquishing sacred liberty's for a temporary solution. You can not have your Constitutional protections both ways. You should rethink your position.
Sparrowhawk is supporting the position of the Constitution, you are not.
You should be asking yourself the question of how these intrusions can be accomplished within Constitutional boundaries.