Tim Nelson
Veteran
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #91
Does anyone have numbers for stations not having posted yet
So far I have these;
STATION NO YES
SNA 19 1
EWR 29 5
PIT 316 24
BUF 4 42
JAX 9 24
ORD 32 6
CLT 720 20
PHL 816 65
DCA 99 37
MIA 8 21
BWI 30 4
LAS 115 170
PHX 52 578
though unconfirmed I believe MIA was a yes vote by a wide margin [like 20 people] and LGA was 83 No, 5 Yes, however both are unconfirmed, should have confirmations tomorrow.
BOS & MCO tomorrow, TPA Friday. All reported in as a big no. Hopefully a unanimous NO since a Yes vote is now a vote for Parker. As of now, 71% NO's across the system, if BOS, etc join the "Big No" team then the NO vote may approach 80%.
Remember, fleet service has held its position and stuck with Plan A, which is a fair and equitable contract. The Canale/Parker plan that attacked Plan A got flushed down the john. Your company needs to be in transition so continue to hold your position with Plan A.
FWIW: It's not really all that important what the company sez, I'm serious about that, don't listen to the company babble you might get from the IAM.
The IAM bosses are running around shouting everything the company has said it will do if you vote this down. Big deal! If Parker sez he will run two separate airlines if he can't get transitions then let him lose out on the synergy loss. If he wants to risk potential merger partners or other financial dealings by keeping things separate then that's his decision. Even Boss Canale said, "The company can not participate in another merger UNTIL it has agreements in place with the machinists union."
What's important is what you, fleet service do. It will be a fight to get what you deserve, and the fight isn't over, it's just begun. The way I figure, if Fleet service doesn't get a contract with dignity and respect then parker won't get a transitioned airline. Bottom line.
And Arbitration is just a 'sweet bonus' but separate from Plan A. Screw any though of Plan B.
Join the network of ramp rats: [email protected]
regards,