NOPE, my duty is not to a committee but to the members especially when the vote is done by the weighted Roll call vote.
You act as if the membership is the opposing party.
Look at how screwed up this whole thing is, a guy gets 500 votes in a Local with 6000 members yet he can vote as if he got 6000 votes and outvote leaders that in total recieved more votes than he did. So if that guy decides he is in favor of a deal then according to you we should all simply roll over on our beliefs and support him?
Then there's the Committee. There are 8 guys from Title II, two of them arent even from Title II, they are Fleet Service Clerks, and another guy no longer holds an elected position as he was voted out by his members months ago, but he is still there, between the 8 of them they represent less than 2000 Title II guys, 6 Line maintence guys representing around 3500 guys and Tulsa. In the meantime the International uses numbers for the Roll call from 2007, many line stations have seen significant growth since then, especially Miami and Dallas but in the Roll Call they do not count, but the hundreds of guys that are no longer in Tulsa do count, even though Tulsa has gone through two election cycles since that number was set. So what did the company do, they threw a few crumbs at Tulsa and a few crumbs at Title II. they've convinced some at Tulsa that they should compare themselves to TIMCO and this industry as whole does not treat Facilities very good so the "Committee" votes to bring it back to the members who will vote on it. You turn around and say that even though we beleieve that this will ruin our chances of restoring our profession within our lifetime, pushed through by a Committee of Fleet service clerks and non-A&Ps that the rest of us should support it? You are one strange fellow with even stranger preconceptions on what this whole thing called Unionism is all about.