A&P schools have to be certified by the FAA,. Not sure but I think the Instructors have to be A&Ps as well. All of mine were. There is no quick fix, why do you think the FAA backed off on duty time limits? They don't want to reduce the number of hours available. There is still a nursing shortage so it doesn't appear to be working as well as you claim in the medical field. I doubt the average age of Nurses is over 50 like with A&Ps. Most of the MROs had already set up shop in those locations years ago and they are all having trouble attracting talent in those areas. Setting up schools drives up overhead and good luck forcing people to stay after they train them. The licenses are issued by the FAA, and are National, not issued by the states like Medical licenses. Sure they may pull that FAR off the shelf that would allow carriers to issue their own licenses but once again, the skillsets are portable to other industries that are usually easier to get to and offer better wages and working conditions. Some have resorted to hiring illegal aliens and not doing background or drug testing. True they don't need to hire A&Ps but at the end of the day even the customer-the airline, is going to want some sort of quality control. Sometimes they do actually learn. I recall a few years back when AA decided to outsource the airbus engines, sure they got them done cheap but half the time we hung the engines we ended up taking them back off without the aircraft even taking a flight. I recall opening them up and having to double check the paperwork thinking that we opened up and engine that was to be shipped out for OH instead of receiving one that was. Sometimes saving money can be costly.eolesen said:Bob, I'm sure that's the case in places like NYC, CHI and LAX, which are high cost of living, and also have higher paying jobs from utility companies, etc.
But that's not the case in the lower cost of living areas where the MRO's are setting up shop. Far fewer opportunities, and it wouldn't surprise me to see some of the MRO's setting up their own feeder schools. Some industries have set up in-house schools which pay for the training as long as you work for them (tuition payments are deferred as long as you stay employed, and zero out over time). The model works pretty well in the medical field, and some airlines already use it for pilots. Sure, it does resemble indentured servitude to some, but if you have a guaranteed job and get paid for your training, it's not a bad option for areas with poor employment opportunities...
Possibly, but if you like the lifestyle in IND, HSV, GSO, OKC, DLH, etc., I'm sure that is incentive enough. It's certainly been the incentive for a fair number of guys in TUL. Your paycheck only goes so far in NYC. Your total living expenses in IND or DLH would probably be close to what housing alone would cost in NYC or SoCal...