TWU informer
Veteran
- Nov 4, 2003
- 7,550
- 3,731
Pretty typical anti-AMFA post. I have asked more than once and here we go again. What exactly is your plan or solution? It appears to be stick with what has failed us to this point. There is proof this idea is failing, there is NO proof the AMFA idea will fail because it has not been tried yet, because members like yourself fear change. Until ALL AMT's unite into one CRAFT Union then the AMFA idea has not been tried in full force. On the other hand, the AFL-CIO Leaders have not felt the concessions like we have, the TWU leaders have not felt the concessions like we have, do you honestly think a damn one of them is the type lf leader that will risk everything they have to lead a revolt? I don't. They live comfortable, are under no threat of being voted out, and they actually believe that getting to testify before Congress, or create some report for them is adequate representation, you can see this in their own writings produced on a regular basis. Every flier, newsletter, or BS internet update reads the same way. No action, No results, just same old tired game. When all that really amounts is a simple self serving ego boost and a big lie. There is plenty of evidence that any perceived power of strength in numbers is false and will not be used. In other words, those rich appointed Bastards don't have the balls to take the necessary risk, and never will. You are dead wrong on the main point and therefore everything you posted in pretty well flawed. The AMFA idea is ALL AMT's into one Union and then action instead politics for relief. Exactly when in the last 50 years has that been tried as you claim? Answer: NEVER And that because the political institution of dues collection is far more important to the other unions than allowing the AMFA idea to succeed, grow, or flourish. In other words, the industrial unions along with Airline management have done everything possible to prevent and defeat the idea as it moves forward And here you are today in this forum, claiming the idea has been tried numerous times in the last 50 years. I call BS on that claim...periodSo we are clear, I agree with you on two points. There is a need for greater coordinated action among working people and unions to fight our continuing loss of rights. I also agree that the IBT with its long history of corruption, raiding, and miserable relations with other unions is a poor vehicle for solidarity. This shows up in their representation because they are probably the most decertified union in the history of the industry. And we would probably also agree that it is just ludicrous for the IBT to claim that its “strength” prevents outsourcing when there isn’t a single carrier where it represents mechanics where a majority of the work or the majority of heavy overhaul is required to be done in house or is actually done in house. However, I just disagree with you that there is any reason to believe Amfa is a better vehicle for the mass movement you are seeking.
I don’t have the time or space to go into the list of Amfa bargaining failures. However, it’s quite obvious that in dealing with the unfair restrictions of bankruptcy they have not done any better or made any different decisions than the TWU or anyone else. But, take a look at this board. On the one hand you make a reasonable point about the need for solidarity among transportation workers, yet roughly one out of every three posts is about how mechanics are being dragged down by lesser skilled workers (even though the mechanic and related craft has workers of just about all skill levels). Do you think that this mentality – or the mentality of your various co-hoards’ who compare President Obama to Hitler and Stalin—is a basis for building solidarity among the very workers who you will need support from?
I’ll give you another example of something that bothered me from a friend on the railroad. Back in 2005 or so Amfa picketed a rail hub in the Midwest asking the workers to shut it down in solidarity with the NWA strike. There was no coordination with the union that represented the workers, or even advance warning. It was unlawful for the rail workers to honor the picket line, but they did and a number were disciplined and lost pay as a result. It was a result that could have been avoided if AMFA had displayed the normal respect that is due to another union and its workers.
Look, the labor movement is in a bad way and we face massive political and economic opposition, but Amfa is not a new solution to any of this. It is an old solution which has been tried numerous times over the last fifty years with very mixed results in general and horrible results for heavy overhaul. If you are saying that we need more solidarity between workers at all skill levels and in all facets of transportation I would agree. I disagree that Amfa is capable of producing this result or even helping reach it.
In Solidarity
CIO