Nov/Dec 2013 Fleet Service Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
cltrat said:
not an hour ago an agent swore he heard everything on that paper going around is true, this is what we are up against.
Someday it can be proven to you and everyone that the Company never offered anything close to what UnitedWeStand posted earlier. Trust is key at this point. 
 
P. Rez
 
P. REZ said:
Someday it can be proven to you and everyone that the Company never offered anything close to what UnitedWeStand posted earlier. Trust is key at this point. 
 
P. Rez
P rez I know that but with people going around telling it,I have realistically no more cred then him to say it's not true.
 
cltrat said:
P rez I know that but with people going around telling it,I have realistically no more cred then him to say it's not true.
I hear you cltrat, but in time the facts will come out. The proposal from the Company was well off from those numbers. I get beat up every time I come back from negotiations and wish the Company proposal was better, but it has been disappointing. 
 
P. Rez
 
IMO, no offense to anyone on here posting. But I think we are making too big of a deal on a fake piece of paper going around in clt folks. I seen the paper, it has nothing from the IAM on it. Not a header or address or anything. There are always rumors that go around at negotiations time. All the break rooms I visited the other day, the majority of the fleet was laughing about it saying they knew it wasn't true. If people want to believe it after we have stated it's not true, then so be it. All we can do is be open and honest with everyone. But I know the majority of the agents just laughed it off.
 
Cb I wish you all the luck at ur next round of talks. Ill be straight up bro I dont think those jackasses from tempe are truly willing to at the very bare min be willin to give us the aa or better wages but thats just me bro. Again I wish u all good luck
 
robbedagain said:
Cb I wish you all the luck at ur next round of talks. Ill be straight up bro I dont think those jackasses from tempe are truly willing to at the very bare min be willin to give us the aa or better wages but thats just me bro. Again I wish u all good luck
Thanks Robbed
Eventually the company is going to want to start combining operations, so they can realize the wonderful synergies that Parker promised the creditors. So while I can't tell you when, the company is going to have to come around sometime, or I say, let's just keep the operations seperate. No synergies for the creditors from fleet service.
 
charlie Brown said:
Thanks Robbed
Eventually the company is going to want to start combining operations, so they can realize the wonderful synergies that Parker promised the creditors. So while I can't tell you when, the company is going to have to come around sometime, or I say, let's just keep the operations seperate. No synergies for the creditors from fleet service.
 As long as we stand firm on "RETRO" pay i feel it's like a savings acct. You have already worked the hrs. 
 
that retro  would that go back to say 99  or how would the retro be determined if we were to get that
 
robbedagain said:
that retro  would that go back to say 99  or how would the retro be determined if we were to get that
99?.. Not a chance. From amendable date is what it should be. It's negotiated. Should be whatever you've missed out on from the Amendable till signing
 
that retro  would that go back to say 99  or how would the retro be determined if we were to get that
Hey Robbed. Better go check the number of bags your threw on the plane. LOL. Happy Holidays
 
Solidarity said:
Hey Robbed. Better go check the number of bags your threw on the plane. LOL. Happy Holidays
i would except for one thing bro   i work tomorrow lol  happy holidays to you bro
 
If retro is negotiated it goes back to the amendable date of the CBA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top