Personally, if I got displaced, I would consider moving, or looking for a new job. But I realize that's not the right choice (out of 3 alternatives) for everybody. Like any choice, each one has its own risk & benefits.Light Years said:So what do you do when you are displaced to three different bases in a matter of a year... the last being New York after your pay has been reduced by a huge percentile? Do you move three times in one year?
[post="302584"][/post]
My point was referring back to an earlier suggestion that commuters should get a higher priority than other non-revs. I totally disagree with that. Non-revving is a benefit: some employees benefit by non-revving to save money on vacation; others benefit by taking a quick hop just for the fun of it; others benefit by being able to live away from their base city. Those that choose to commute should not get priority over others that choose to use their benefits for fun. If I am not in a hurry on my vacation, I would have absolutely no problem giving up a seat for a commuter trying to get to work. But if I have to be somewhere at a certain time, or have to get back to work after vacation myself, I would want my priority based on either check-in time or seniority (whatever the final decision is).