Cosmo
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 840
- 0
----------------
On 4/7/2003 701 PM RV4 wrote:
Your list of "facts" proves nothing about "we will end up worse".
----------------
One of my facts from a previous post was that a company loses control over its future in a bankruptcy proceeding. So please explain how others (whose best interests may not coincide with those of your company''s) having your future in their control will not lead to worse prospects for you than making any needed changes outside of the bankruptcy process.On 4/7/2003 701 PM RV4 wrote:
Your list of "facts" proves nothing about "we will end up worse".
----------------
----------------
On 4/7/2003 701 PM RV4 wrote:
In addition, please provide how you determine the following statements not to be factual?
If the company goes under the creditors are screwed!
If the employees get screwed the company goes under!
----------------
While the two above statements might be factual in certain circumstances, it depends on the specific situation. In your first statement, some of the creditors might indeed be screwed if a company liquidates, but some might not (particularly secured creditors). In addition, some creditors might conclude that they would be "less screwed" by a liquidation than by allowing a company''s operations to continue. And in your second statement, that is demonstrably not true in all cases. Just in the airline industry, by any reasonable definition of the word "screwed", the employees of bankrupt Continental (in 1983) and US Airways (this year) fit into that category yet these two companies are still operating.On 4/7/2003 701 PM RV4 wrote:
In addition, please provide how you determine the following statements not to be factual?
If the company goes under the creditors are screwed!
If the employees get screwed the company goes under!
----------------