MCI AFL-CIO
Advanced
- Sep 29, 2003
- 151
- 0
I would like to say, "nice to have met you also". However, you apparently still cower behind your alias, because you DID NOT identifiy yourself to me, thus we DID NOT MEET as far as I am concerned. Do you understand the proper and accepted way to "meet someone"?
Dave, Im sorry Dave, I thought a handshake and nice to meet you and giving my name was proper procedure? Yeah Dave you slammed me, ok, I give, Guess I was not that valuable of a guest for you to remember me, Thats ok Dave, I have always been genuine to you onthis board, now I see the real you comes shinig thru, It Is true, people who live in glass houses should not throw stones
I never said "get over it" when it came to your senioirty. I said "it would be a minority issue
MyApologies Dave, It was Don Rodgers who stood at the front desk saying "Get Over It"..............you were the one who said, And I appreciate your answer, You said " I am an honest man, I wont come here and say somethingyou want to hear, I will tell you the truth and the truth is if your number 1 goal at contract talks is to win back senority issues and Tulsas number 1 goal is to obtain more vacation, under AMFA we would listen to the majority"
Dave forgive me, Im not coming here to preach over my senority, that is not a major concern to me, I never plan to leave MCI, and Im happy with my senority here, the point Im trying to make here is, what you asnwered for me "In a majority Rule Union Structure" meaning, that AMFA will listen but will not always answer you, correct? Translation: if another local has more members, under AMFA they work the majority?
I also told everyone that "AMFA is not the solution to your seniority" problem. Would you rather me speak what you want to hear, or the TRUTH? AMFA is the answer to our eroding profession, not a white knight to fix the TWA/AA Seniority issue. If you are looking for that white knight, I would suggest you go to the Federal Courts.
Dave, I appreciate you telling the audience that AMFA is not the solution, but I disagree with your response that AMFA is the choice to our eroding profession......in my opinion and I know your going to"slam" me again, but our profession is eroded because of the constant RAID by AMFA
Dave once again, Im not concerned with the senority issue, its over, "GET OVER IT"
Contrary to what you are propagating, AMFA support cannot be guaged on meeting attendance. Your own TWU phone survey will prove that true. So will the NMB ballot soon enough
Dave, I am not propagating anything, I stated that while this meeting at MCI was billed as informational, it was AMFAs way of finding what support there was at MCI, why else would the top brass be here? If in deed it was an informational meeting, that could have been handled by you, Don Rodgers, Dan Cunningham, and Chuck Schalk. Dave, I am for democracy, Im for an election, I do not hide behind or run from this, I feel secure in knowing the outcome, either way, I and you will survive, what worried me Dave, is that while we have the TWU, we have resistance, and IF we have AMFA, we will have resistance, neither a pleasantry? Is this a value of life?
Yes, I was shocked by the F word when used by Seham. But everything he was making reference to when used was fact! You are probabaly correct about TWU meetings and bad language.
Dave, true Im a grown man, but I will not use that lnaguage to describe or infatuate an audience, I do not want an open apolgy from Lee Seham, we all know how valid that would be, dont we? Sure its easy to saw sorry but to actually mean it? the harm is done, he was blowinghis own horn I know , He got carreid away, and what was it..............2 minutes after Kevin gave the guidelines? Oh boy, we want him as our lawyer, he dont understnad guidelines and he makes rules?
does using that language to you Dave when he was stating a fact make it ok to say? With zero tolerance at AA Dave, How many members have been fired just by walking by 2 individuals and hearing ina general conversation that word used?
What would his consequences be Dave if I did come forward with my name and hear is unfaithful apology?
Sorry if you were offended, if I knew your name and address, I would get you a personal apology from Lee. Of course you are not man enough to go there. So let's just say, that your complaints (attendance, flag, pledge, prayer) have some validity, but if we addressed those, you would just hide behind your alias and complain about something else
Dave did I hit a nerve? why the unfriendly remark about my being a man? go where Dave? Its ok for him to talk that way because he is PROPER, he is AMFA,
Dave besides his language, what else did I complain of? I only gave my opinion, my notes of the AMFA meeting at MCI, You agree they are valid then you SLAM me again and again, What good would it do to announce my name Dave, You already forgot me, my handshake didnt leave a lasting impression?
Dave, of the AMFA meetings you have attended, did the membership, recite the Pledge? have a moment of silence? or is it that this was an informational meeting so its ok, to not even salute the flag?
Dave, thank you for the apology, genuine, sincere, Dave, I wil say here, and I am genuinely Sincere Dave, I am not perfect, but you will never hear me call you a name, unless in greatness, you will never hear me use vulgar language around or in the presence of women, and usually not in presence of men, its not needed, and I will never say a discouraging word to anyone and wish death or harm to another, never hear a threatening word from me Dave
Now I have answered a few questions of yours WILL YOU NOW ANSWER SOME FROM ME?
Dave ask away, Im not an officer, but I will try to answer and If I can I will get an answer, thats in my opinion is what this board is to used for, not for namecalling
Dave, Im sorry Dave, I thought a handshake and nice to meet you and giving my name was proper procedure? Yeah Dave you slammed me, ok, I give, Guess I was not that valuable of a guest for you to remember me, Thats ok Dave, I have always been genuine to you onthis board, now I see the real you comes shinig thru, It Is true, people who live in glass houses should not throw stones
I never said "get over it" when it came to your senioirty. I said "it would be a minority issue
MyApologies Dave, It was Don Rodgers who stood at the front desk saying "Get Over It"..............you were the one who said, And I appreciate your answer, You said " I am an honest man, I wont come here and say somethingyou want to hear, I will tell you the truth and the truth is if your number 1 goal at contract talks is to win back senority issues and Tulsas number 1 goal is to obtain more vacation, under AMFA we would listen to the majority"
Dave forgive me, Im not coming here to preach over my senority, that is not a major concern to me, I never plan to leave MCI, and Im happy with my senority here, the point Im trying to make here is, what you asnwered for me "In a majority Rule Union Structure" meaning, that AMFA will listen but will not always answer you, correct? Translation: if another local has more members, under AMFA they work the majority?
I also told everyone that "AMFA is not the solution to your seniority" problem. Would you rather me speak what you want to hear, or the TRUTH? AMFA is the answer to our eroding profession, not a white knight to fix the TWA/AA Seniority issue. If you are looking for that white knight, I would suggest you go to the Federal Courts.
Dave, I appreciate you telling the audience that AMFA is not the solution, but I disagree with your response that AMFA is the choice to our eroding profession......in my opinion and I know your going to"slam" me again, but our profession is eroded because of the constant RAID by AMFA
Dave once again, Im not concerned with the senority issue, its over, "GET OVER IT"
Contrary to what you are propagating, AMFA support cannot be guaged on meeting attendance. Your own TWU phone survey will prove that true. So will the NMB ballot soon enough
Dave, I am not propagating anything, I stated that while this meeting at MCI was billed as informational, it was AMFAs way of finding what support there was at MCI, why else would the top brass be here? If in deed it was an informational meeting, that could have been handled by you, Don Rodgers, Dan Cunningham, and Chuck Schalk. Dave, I am for democracy, Im for an election, I do not hide behind or run from this, I feel secure in knowing the outcome, either way, I and you will survive, what worried me Dave, is that while we have the TWU, we have resistance, and IF we have AMFA, we will have resistance, neither a pleasantry? Is this a value of life?
Yes, I was shocked by the F word when used by Seham. But everything he was making reference to when used was fact! You are probabaly correct about TWU meetings and bad language.
Dave, true Im a grown man, but I will not use that lnaguage to describe or infatuate an audience, I do not want an open apolgy from Lee Seham, we all know how valid that would be, dont we? Sure its easy to saw sorry but to actually mean it? the harm is done, he was blowinghis own horn I know , He got carreid away, and what was it..............2 minutes after Kevin gave the guidelines? Oh boy, we want him as our lawyer, he dont understnad guidelines and he makes rules?
does using that language to you Dave when he was stating a fact make it ok to say? With zero tolerance at AA Dave, How many members have been fired just by walking by 2 individuals and hearing ina general conversation that word used?
What would his consequences be Dave if I did come forward with my name and hear is unfaithful apology?
Sorry if you were offended, if I knew your name and address, I would get you a personal apology from Lee. Of course you are not man enough to go there. So let's just say, that your complaints (attendance, flag, pledge, prayer) have some validity, but if we addressed those, you would just hide behind your alias and complain about something else
Dave did I hit a nerve? why the unfriendly remark about my being a man? go where Dave? Its ok for him to talk that way because he is PROPER, he is AMFA,
Dave besides his language, what else did I complain of? I only gave my opinion, my notes of the AMFA meeting at MCI, You agree they are valid then you SLAM me again and again, What good would it do to announce my name Dave, You already forgot me, my handshake didnt leave a lasting impression?
Dave, of the AMFA meetings you have attended, did the membership, recite the Pledge? have a moment of silence? or is it that this was an informational meeting so its ok, to not even salute the flag?
Dave, thank you for the apology, genuine, sincere, Dave, I wil say here, and I am genuinely Sincere Dave, I am not perfect, but you will never hear me call you a name, unless in greatness, you will never hear me use vulgar language around or in the presence of women, and usually not in presence of men, its not needed, and I will never say a discouraging word to anyone and wish death or harm to another, never hear a threatening word from me Dave
Now I have answered a few questions of yours WILL YOU NOW ANSWER SOME FROM ME?
Dave ask away, Im not an officer, but I will try to answer and If I can I will get an answer, thats in my opinion is what this board is to used for, not for namecalling