Not true sir. This will be an alliance vote within the union. These guys are already represented, therefore this is not a representational vote called upon by the majority of the membership. I encourage you all to write the NMB and ask for yourselves. After months of argueing with 700 over this issue he finally aknowledged that the option of either other or write in will be on there, if this is the case then the membership will need to write in who they want to represent them. If it is not an option vote NO or against alliance as the unions cannot decert themselves from representing you it would take the NMB to decert. You guys really need to do your OWN homework. NEVER rely on any union that is involved (TWU/IAM) and please do not rely on me, write the NMB and get the facts from the horses mouth, the TWU and IAM will lie thru their teeth at a last ditch effort to keep the dues flowing in...ThirdSeatHero said:
Chuck your post illustrates the common misconceptions about your upcoming vote.
You are correct the NMB doesn't cover would be union alliances, what they do cover is representational elections.
That is the key to all the confusion - this is not a vote on the FORMATION of the TWU/IAM alliance, The TWU and the IAM hierarchy did that on their own without a membership vote. This is a REPRESENTATIONAL vote on whether or not the AA/US mechanics want them as a CBA representative, and that is a function that falls under the jurisdiction of the NMB.
Please check the NMB link I posted earlier in this thread it spells out exactly how merger representational votes are conducted.
Bob please explain to these guys to get their own information they will be shocked at how much the IAM/TWU alliance is lying to its members...