hillary 2016

[SparrowHawk]

She is being given better then due process Glenn. I don't like the "Nothing to hide nothing to fear" justification even a little, just pointing out that with what she has riding on that investigation, total disclosure might be the way to go. People who think they are above the law seldom take that path and for many it comes back to bite them in the arse.
 
I don't like her politics, I don't trust her even a little, I think she is a glory hound to the point she would damage the working class to make herself look good. However. I'd like to not have her fall from grace due to criminal activity. I think it would be bad for the country. In fact if I were POTUS, even a Libertarian I'd strongly consider pardoning her. It would likely be in the national interest to do so.

 

[Dog Wonder]

I don't like her politics, I don't trust her even a little, I think she is a glory hound to the point she would damage the working class to make herself look good.
 

Change her to him and who do you have?

 

[SparrowHawk]

Richard Nixon

 

[700UW]

You can't compare watergate to the e-mail situation, totally different.

 

[Ms Tree]

She is being given better then due process Glenn. I don't like the "Nothing to hide nothing to fear" justification even a little, just pointing out that with what she has riding on that investigation, total disclosure might be the way to go. People who think they are above the law seldom take that path and for many it comes back to bite them in the arse.
 
I don't like her politics, I don't trust her even a little, I think she is a glory hound to the point she would damage the working class to make herself look good. However. I'd like to not have her fall from grace due to criminal activity. I think it would be bad for the country. In fact if I were POTUS, even a Libertarian I'd strongly consider pardoning her. It would likely be in the national interest to do so.

Why pardon her?  If she is guilty then let her suffer the consequences.  I do not buy into the idea that seeing a cabinet member or even a siting president convicted of a felony sitting in jail doing any harm to the fabric of the country.  In fact having a former head of state or cabinet member sitting in the slammer sends a clear message that no one should be above the law, not even the president.
 
I think the pardons of Nixon et-al and North et-al were disgusting.  They committed crimes against the state and should have been prosecuted and if found guilty punish like anyone else.  All the pardons accomplished is showing the country and the world that in the US legal system, some are more/less equal than others.

 

[Dog Wonder]

Change her to him and who do you have?

 

Richard Nixon

And the entire cast of presidential wannabees.  Why do you think they run?

 

[cltrat]

 
You do a Shiit load of Trash talking on here... ' Rat, sooooo as the old saying goes,....... PUT UP, or SHUT UP,........meaning that  IF the feds don't find that she broke the law, then you'll...SHUT UP by saying that she was Not Guilty   ????
 
Well all be WATCHING citRAT, to see who's FULL of Shite   !!!!!!!!!!!!!

you have a lot of gall to talk to me about trash talking, for years you've been telling us Ol Hill as you called her like you were bff's or something ridiculous like that was a stone cold lock to be in the white house now that is looking pretty dubious at best so yeah you're right We're watching to see who is full of shite .If she don't get there you'll never hear the end of it.

 

[SparrowHawk]

Funny, Bob Woodward did exactly that and he should know, he was there in 1974.

 

[cltrat]

Funny, Bob Woodward did exactly that and he should know, he was there in 1974.

let me get this straight Sparrow are you actually suggesting that Woodward is more credible than occupydemocrat or huff n puff? you got some stones ...lol

 

[delldude]

Just out:
 
https://www.gop.com/secret-server-wiper/

 

[700UW]

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/news/state-department-confirms-hillary-clinton-email-violated-no-laws-or-policies/21851/

Hillary didn't violate policy or law.

 

[SparrowHawk]

This time, That women has so many scandals dating back to her involvement in the Watergate Committee that in my mind says she is untrustworthy.

 

[southwind]

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/news/state-department-confirms-hillary-clinton-email-violated-no-laws-or-policies/21851/
Hillary didn't violate policy or law.

Keep telling yourself that!

Problem is when she's goes under indictment, she CAN NOT run and she will be indicted!

"As Hillery Implodes, the Democrats Have No REAL Plan B!"

http://nypost.com/2015/08/22/as-hillary-implodes-the-democrats-have-no-real-plan-b/

 

[700UW]

She has been cleared, so what indictment?
 
You need to go back to English 101 and learn to comprehend what you try to read.
 
Plan B is Biden and Warren.

 

[SparrowHawk]

Cleared by the Fox guarding the hen house!
 
I found the article interesting for what was NOT said.
 
1. The FBI investigation is not necessarily moot. The State Department is not a Law Enforcement Agency and has no say in who investigates whom or what gets investigated
 
2. Not being all that well versed in the laws that would apply, but it would seem to me that one could be guilty of High Crimes & Misdemeanors without violating State Department rules or even laws.
 
3 I found this published just 3 hours ago
http://www.businessinsider.com/theres-an-ominous-precedent-lurking-over-hillary-clintons-email-scandal-2015-8   Originally published by that right wing conspiracy the Washington Post.
 
We haven't seen the end​ of this yet