- Status
777 fixer
Veteran
- Jul 21, 2004
- 4,792
- 900
delldude said:
Did you even read the article? Or did you just skim over it?
Maliki had a part in the formation of ISIS, there's not doubt about that. The problem with the narrative you are buying into is that Maliki would not be in power if there had been no invasion. Kind of hard for him to piss off the Sunni's so bad they flock to ISIS if he's not in power. Without some kind of support from the local population no group like that can exist.
Assad would not have had a group to ignore if there had been no invasion since Iraq would not have been a training ground for a generation of Jihadi's, or a job for former Saddam loyalists.
Iran would not have a base of operation in Iraq, which riles up the Sunni's to no end, since Saddam would not have allowed them in the country in the first place.
In the end the catalyst that sent these events in motion is the invasion of Iraq. No invasion, no Al Queda in Iraq, no pissed off Sunni's to start ISIS, no one thrown into Abu Grhaib to make connections with and start ISIS.
777 fixer said:
So; if it weren't for the evil USA's invasion of the gentle Saddam Hussein's Iraq, then all would be well and the world forever left to live in peace with "the religion of peace"? Sigh!...Seriously? Guess again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92myDzAFgU4
https://www.google.com/search?q=the+grand+mufti+and+hitler&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=A8ZJVavuGo3hggSvhYCADA&ved=0CDEQsAQ&biw=1920&bih=945
https://factreal.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/muslim-crusades-started-four-centuries-before-the-western-crusades/
http://history-world.org/islam4.htm
http://www.cbn.com/spirituallife/onlinediscipleship/understandingislam/islamhistory0212.aspx
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/earlyrise_1.shtml
P.S. Grand kudos to any/all "liberal" morons that're so insanely supportive of the pathetic little "pimp-in-chief" and his enthusiastic efforts to essentially assure that Iran gains nuclear weapons....Sometimes?...Words just fail me, and after all; "Death to America!" has such an endearingly "cute" little ring to it anyway...Right?
777 fixer
Veteran
- Jul 21, 2004
- 4,792
- 900
EastUS1 said:
Simple question. Was the invasion of Iraq worth the lives of over four thousand Americans god knows how many Iraqi's and almost trillion dollars spent on it? Mind you the whole pretext was based on a lie. So what is it, yes or no. Can't be to hard to answer.
So what is it, yes or no.
777 fixer said:
"Simple" is right wherever your questions are concerned. The pathetic conduct/Rules of Engagement demanded in Iraq by fools in DC made those thousands of deaths happen, not the invasion and initial conquest of Iraq. Desert Storm 1991: Iraq's (then the world's 4th largest Army) was not only completely beaten into submission by us but actually destroyed with the loss of less than 200 American lives in combat ops. (By "us" of course, I certainly don't mean you or any other "liberal", since your sad sorts generally like to stay at least thousands of miles away from so much as firecrackers popping..well...unless "heroically" umm...."landing under sniper fire" of course)...After the occupation in 2003?...You must properly blame all the "touchy-feely" BS from DC that just set up our beautifully brave young people to be nothing more than available targets for easy slaughter on a daily basis by any half-wit with a road-side bomb.
The invasion was the right thing to do....but any actually lasting conquest of Iraq was made utterly impossible by spineless scum in DC, and the needless deaths of our thousands of youngsters AFTER they'd kicked the crap out of Saddam's military lies entirely on the blood-soaked hands of the vilest forms of "life" possible = "politicians"....
P.S. Per ""Simple" is right wherever your questions are concerned." I (so very surprisingly) must observe that not even the slightest response to my earlier post #314 did you dare even attempt. Why's that? No matter, since it's always been my personal experience that "liberals" shirk any encounters that even might topple them off their momentary joy-rides of choice inside Fantasyland....and I do mean momentary, as you complete fools have NO idea of what's coming, and just what sort of grand future's nowadays being established by you sorry ilk for all Americans. Permit me another small "hint" as to what's probable within at the VERY most the next two decades due to all your "touchy-feely" clinical insanity. For even the sake of family lineage alone; I earnestly hope and pray that I'm entirely wrong....but no rationally constructed comfort's at all possible against this likely happening:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aza-2wopCFY
La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
When they are not aborting the miracle because it would be too "inconvenient".EastUS1 said:
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
