Feb / Mar 2013 US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I demand you put "duh" back as your tagline. It is now a fixture on this forum. I cannot live without it. I might hire Marty to sue you.

Greeter

"duh" is copyrighted!

And Marty has already contacted me... promised to help me sue any West pilot that tries to start using it... I asked him if he thought that would be a conflict of interest. Seems he didn't think about that... and then he cursed himself, saying it wasn't the first mistake he made this week.
 
I smell an Injunction followed closely by Checkmate. The USCABA crime spree is ending soon.


Injunction on what? There is no POR yet. I think the merger is a sure thing, but it ain't legal yet. Not a done deal in the eyes of the government, courts, or even business world.

No pay raises, no new vacation, nada. Status quo until this Fall at the earliest. We are still parked by NMB, and still under the previous injunction in NC.

Nobody is presenting or negotiating anything right now, other than AOL and Marty on a reasonable payment plan.

More premature adjudication? I see a trend.

Greeter
 
"duh" is copyrighted!

And Marty has already contacted me... promised to help me sue any West pilot that tries to start using it... I asked him if he thought that would be a conflict of interest. Seems he didn't think about that... and then he cursed himself, saying it wasn't the first mistake he made this week.

I think we are getting your head, Phoenix. It's looking like St Nic visited that tag line of yours.

DUH
(all caps, no violation)
 
Injunction on what? There is no POR yet. I think the merger is a sure thing, but it ain't legal yet. Not a done deal in the eyes of the government, courts, or even business world.

No pay raises, no new vacation, nada. Status quo until this Fall at the earliest. We are still parked by NMB, and still under the previous injunction in NC.

Nobody is presenting or negotiating anything right now, other than AOL and Marty on a reasonable payment plan.

More premature adjudication? I see a trend.

Greeter

Things happen pretty quick.

Better check the legal docs.

BTW. If Marty is wiling to do the work and trusts the west will pay. Why would you worry about him getting paid? It is not your problem. Living with the Nicolau will be your problem.
 
I think we are getting your head, Phoenix. It's looking like St Nic visited that tag line of yours.

DUH
(all caps, no violation)

Yes, the tag line is a parody of a St. Nic supporter calling you to donate.

Your use of "DUH" is a violation for being too similar to "DOH", but you are forgiven.. if you donate again to the "friends list".
 
Things happen pretty quick.

Better check the legal docs.

BTW. If Marty is wiling to do the work and trusts the west will pay. Why would you worry about him getting paid? It is not your problem. Living with the Nicolau will be your problem.
Try thinking about baseball.
 
You would be hard pressed to invent someone who does more harm to the things he pretends to support.

I don't agree with everything he says or his style but you'd be hard pressed to find someone who draws more attention to the things he supports.
 
Yes, the tag line is a parody of a St. Nic supporter calling you to donate.

Your use of "DUH" is a violation for being too similar to "DOH", but you are forgiven.. if you donate again to the "friends list".

Nice return :lol:

Having a lot of friends in Phoenix, I'm glad you did not "copyright" your screen name.
 
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Don ADDINGTON; et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
US AIRLINE PILOTS ASS’N, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00471-PGR
Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Enjoining Defendants (and their
Successors) From Integrating Pilot
Seniority Without Using the Nicolau
Award List to Define the Relative
Seniority of US Airways Pilots.
Plaintiffs file this motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants (and their successors) from integrating pilot seniority without using the Nicolau Award list to define the relative seniority of US Airways pilots. This motion is supported by the Memorandum of Points and Authorities that follows, a Separate Statement of Facts, and a declaration supporting exhibits to that statement.
Dated this 26th day of March, 2013.
POLSINELLI SHUGHART, PC
/s/ Andrew S. Jacob
By _______________________________
Marty Harper
Andrew S. Jacob
Jennifer Axel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
 
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Don ADDINGTON; et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
US AIRLINE PILOTS ASS’N, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00471-PGR
Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Enjoining Defendants (and their
Successors) From Integrating Pilot
Seniority Without Using the Nicolau
Award List to Define the Relative
Seniority of US Airways Pilots.
Plaintiffs file this motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants (and their successors) from integrating pilot seniority without using the Nicolau Award list to define the relative seniority of US Airways pilots. This motion is supported by the Memorandum of Points and Authorities that follows, a Separate Statement of Facts, and a declaration supporting exhibits to that statement.
Dated this 26th day of March, 2013.
POLSINELLI SHUGHART, PC
/s/ Andrew S. Jacob
By _______________________________
Marty Harper
Andrew S. Jacob
Jennifer Axel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Marty is mocking mere taxpayers who work for a living and are unwillingly subjected to his abuse of the legal system.
 
March 26, 2013
Leonidas Update
3.jpg


Today, attorneys for the West pilots filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction against USAPA in the Arizona Federal District Court. You can read the filings by clicking here and here. Additionally, this morning Marty Harper sent the following letter to USAPA. Finally, the West attorneys filed a Motion for Class Certification yesterday, which you can read here.

We strongly encourage all pilots to download and read these filings.

Sincerely,

Leonidas, LLC


Link to docs: http://www.cactuspilot.com/

Case 2:13-cv-00471-PGR Document 14 Filed 03/26/13
Excerpt:



103. In August 2007, West Pilots formed Leonidas, LLC, for the sole purpose of collecting voluntary West Pilot contributions to be used to defray the expense of defending the Nicolau Award in and out of litigation.111
104. On March 6, 2013, USAPA filed an adversary proceeding against Leonidas, LLC, (not these Plaintiffs or the West Pilot Class) in the AMR Chapter 11 proceedings in a flawed effort to deter the West Pilots from taking action here to compel USAPA to adhere to its duty.112
105. USAPA claims that Leonidas, LLC, is threatening litigation.113
106. Leonidas, LLC, has never been a party to litigation.114
107. Leonidas, LLC, has never sent a letter to USAPA, US Airways, APA, or their counsel.115
108. Leonidas, LLC, has never threatened to instigate any litigation itself.116
109. The Bankruptcy Court has scheduled a telephonic “CourtCall Telephonic Appearance” hearing for April 3, 2013, at 11:00 AM, to determine whether it is necessary for Leonidas, LLC, to file a motion to dismiss the adversary proceeding.1172840719.11
110. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for April 23, 2013, in New York. 118
111. APA, the union that will represent the US Airways pilots after the merger, recently stated that it “takes no position on the merits of the dispute between the former East and former West pilots” but “has no wish to inherit this dispute in the event of a merger and will push to have it resolved.”119
112. The MOU provides that any disputes over interpretation of its provisions shall be resolved by expedited arbitration between the parties. 120
113. The MOU provides that the first step in pilot seniority integration will be to make a “Protocol Agreement [that] will set forth the process and protocol for conducting negotiations and arbitration, if applicable, and will include a methodology for allocating the reimbursement provided for in Paragraph 7.”121
114. The MOU provides that a total sum of $5.5 million will be available to defray the expenses incurred by pilot merger representatives and unions.122
118 Id. at ¶ 14 [App. 423].
 
Marty is mocking mere taxpayers who work for a living and are unwillingly subjected to his abuse of the legal system.
It east pilots would have lived up to your obligations none of this court proceedings would be required.

So it is east pilots and usapa that is subjecting the court system to abuse.

We also see that ause in the RICO suit and the American BK filing.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top