Doug Parker decries profit sharing....

Lucky777 said:
I stand corrected.....thanks for bringing out the facts and not simply relying on hearsay like yours truly did, much appreciated.
No problem, and you are welcome.
 
FWAAA said:
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news (for you), but you are incorrect. For Delta pilots, their profit-sharing is contractual; it's in their CBA. I am not a Delta pilot, but I am capable of reading their CBA.

For everyone else at Delta (except the unionized dispatchers), profit-sharing can be modified by management. If the pilots ratify an agreement that reduces their profit-sharing, it is very likely that Delta will unilaterally modify everyone's profit-sharing formula.
They have already reduced the 2017 payout formula for the year 2016.
 
700UW said:
They have already reduced the 2017 payout formula for the year 2016.
your a Broken record the ps was reduced for pay raises in Lew of higher ps. That's more ps then we get at aa its zero percent . And the aa side is not getting one this year because of jim little .on the twu side
 
conehead777 said:
your a Broken record the ps was reduced for pay raises in Lew of higher ps. That's more ps then we get at aa its zero percent . And the aa side is not getting one this year because of jim little .on the twu side
No it was not, they got a pay raise last year, not this year.
 
It was reduced in 2012 by 33% pilots got a 20% raise from June 2012 till December of 2014, while ACS got 2%-8% raise over the same time period, depending on when they were hired. The non- union ACS have three decades different pay scales
 
PS was reduced effective this year with no raise given to make it up.
 
Educate yourself.
 
Lucky777 said:
Pay up big man, i couldn't have been more wrong on this issue!!!
 
For the life of me i thought profit-sharing was across-the-board for all employees and didn't realise the pilots actually had it in writing in their contract so color me ignorant. Live and learn i suppose....and no, humble pie never tastes good lol
I'll gladly pay up. It's rare that someone comes back on here and admits they were wrong about anything.

That's called character. Good for you sir.
 
Overspeed said:
Is anyone else concerned about how little stock is actually held by the board and senior execs? The amount of stock held by "insiders" at AAL is less than 0.2%. Most company's have insiders holding more stock (playing long) because they believe the company's stock will rise. Parker and company appear to dumping their stock awards as soon as tehy get them. Do they know something about the long term health of AAL that isn't good?
I despise Doug Parker, but on this issue, I don't fault him. Starting in May, 2015 (and future years, unless the board changes his compensation formula), Parker received no cash salary and no cash bonus from AA; instead, his compensation is 100% stock and other somewhat complex equity-based pay. And the amount of stock he gets depends on AA's performance.

I'm not an expert in how much employer stock a CEO should own, but the AA board's compensation committee has consulted experts to get their opinions, as have most other large corporations. In last year's Proxy Statement, AA said that under the board-adopted formula, Parker's 2015 minimum stock holdings were computed to be 116,667 shares, and in April, 2015, Parker owned 625,000 shares, about five times the minimum level as determined by the board. By July 1, 2015, Parker owned 1.6 million shares, more than 13 times the minimum required of him.

In May, 2015, Parker had about 2 million shares worth of additional various equity awards that had not yet vested, worth about $70 million. At AA's current share price, Parker has about $100 million tied up in AA stock between the stock he currently holds plus all the not-yet-vested equity awards.

Parker's total compensation for 2015 is probably north of $20 million in AA stock due to the outrageously huge profit of $6.3 billion, excluding special items, and as he actually gets that stock in the future, it's all ordinary income (not capital gains), and Parker, a one-percenter, is in the top tax bracket of 39.6%, so when he exercises stock options worth, say, $4 million, he has to send the IRS $1.6 million whether or not he sells that stock, so of course he's going to sell quite a bit (most/maybe all) of his new-found stock so he can pay his estimated taxes and have some beer money.

In theory, his ownership percentage actually grows as AA buys back billions worth of AAL stock on the open market, making him even richer, as there are fewer shares outstanding.

When AA gave the employees options for 35 million shares in 2003, there were lots of employees who sold it all on the first day they were permitted to sell, instead of holding onto their shares until January, 2006, when it peaked at $41/sh (which would have been a profit of $36/share, all capital gains).

When AA emerged from bankruptcy, lots of employees boasted here that they were selling all their AAL stock immediately, and thus missed out on the stock more than doubling in value not long after AA left bankruptcy court.

At the extreme, there are AA employees who constantly rationalize that trading away (selling) all of their Horton-granted 15% profit-sharing in exchange for small raises (essentially "buying" their raises) is preferable to having any variable compensation. As an aside, real unions negotiate raises for their membership without giving away their share of the future profits. If management wants to buy back that profit-sharing, real unions would make management pay thru the nose for that privilege. Obviously, no sane individual would confuse the TWU for a real union.

Against that backdrop, it's ironic to read opinions that the CEO isn't holding enough AAL stock, considering that he currently holds more than he did when AA emerged from Ch 11 and he's now paid entirely in variable performance based compensation that's paid out entirely in AA stock, options, and other complex schemes resembling stock that he can't even sell for several years into the future. The stock that Parker sold in 2014 and 2015 isn't stock he earned in 2014 and 2015, it was stock he earned between 2005 and 2013 as the CEO of US Airways. He's exercising options granted to him over the past decade - options that probably would not have been in-the-money but for the merger.

I certainly agree that CEOs should hold a lot of their employer stock, but in this case, it just looks to me like he's holding an awful lot of AA's stock. In a few months, when this year's Proxy Statement is released, we'll get a better idea of how much AA stock Parker holds.
 
Most of if not all his sales were because his stock awards were to to expire. If he didn't and doesn't sell he loses it.
 
Exactly. And the timing of the sales is on a pre-arranged schedule which is really the only way the executives can sell stock because they're always in possession of insider information. Because of laws against insider trading, the executives can't just call their broker and sell the way non-insiders can.
 
FWAAA, thanks for the enlightenment on the executive stock acquisitions and sales.  Makes a lot more sense than my assumptions about exec compensation.  But then, I'm a flight attendant.  I'm paid to be cute, not smart.  :lol:
 
eolesen said:
That's what your union agreed to, no?

E according to our contracts are we entitled to anything for the (sick) amount of profit the company made? No. Some of us absolutely do understand that. But is it really wrong to hope for a Bonus for a job well done? And is it wrong to ask or advocate for it? (Debatable)

If it did come though no matter how much should it be appreciated? Yes.

That's up to management though for the tone they want to set? Personally I'm losing my impression that I had at the beginning when at least for one group at the airline I'm seeing no gestures of any type of good faith so far. Zip......
 
chris perry said:
WE have gain sharing in our contract eolesen they just are ignoring the contract.
There is no formula for what the payouts are and how much. The offers from the company were insulting I heard.
 
WeAAsles said:
There is no formula for what the payouts are and how much. The offers from the company were insulting I heard.
Kind of like 18 months of record profits and we just see the carrot dangling?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top