Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I learned that simply rejecting a contract isn't enough ... you talk of labor strife , well if there isn't any strife then the company doesn't care if a contract is rejected ...We didn't have ENOUGH strife last time ...You've got to get out there and agitate , agitate , agitate ... you have to push people out of their comfort zone and make them understand that a new contract is not going to be presented to you on a silver platter by a kind and caring company ..
necrigrad youre not stupid
Guys,
I’ve been following this thread for years… not once has freedom posted anything of any relevance, validity, or value other than the time stamp and date attached to each post… and that comes from the administrator!
There are only two plausible scenarios with him/her/whoever…
1) The person is actually this far out of touch with reality, and suffers from Delusions of Grandeur, and/or Manic Bipolar Disorder(s).
2) The person is actually a Forum Troll attempting to consume bandwidth, and your time as you attempt to argue his/her/whoever’s foolish never ending, open-ended statements.
I find number two as the most likely case, as I can’t see someone with the number one afflictions making it independently through everyday life, as well as maintaining a career with the sensitivities of today’s background follow-ups, and contractual language allowing someone to be physiologically evaluated at virtually anytime…
So… number TWO it IS!
He is actually a ramper in PHX, a lead friend of mine knows of him, and she said he is actually worse in real life then on the boards.
He is actually a ramper in PHX
she said he is actually worse in real life then on the boards.
I too find number two as the most likely case. He does consume bandwidth as many informed and quality posters waste their time and efforts arguing and discrediting him. Sometimes... two to three pages of back and forth babbling. End result: You read through two or three pages of this before someone makes a meaningful and pertinent post. I would like to see less engagement with freedom and more engagement in meaningful discussion. Shall we proceed?Guys,
I’ve been following this thread for years… not once has freedom posted anything of any relevance, validity, or value other than the time stamp and date attached to each post… and that comes from the administrator!
There are only two plausible scenarios with him/her/whoever…
1) The person is actually this far out of touch with reality, and suffers from Delusions of Grandeur, and/or Manic Bipolar Disorder(s).
2) The person is actually a Forum Troll attempting to consume bandwidth, and your time as you attempt to argue his/her/whoever’s foolish never ending, open-ended statements.
I find number two as the most likely case, as I can’t see someone with the number one afflictions making it independently through everyday life, as well as maintaining a career with the sensitivities of today’s background follow-ups, and contractual language allowing someone to be physiologically evaluated at virtually anytime…
So… number TWO it IS!
I too find number two as the most likely case. He does consume bandwidth as many informed and quality posters waste their time and efforts arguing and discrediting him. Sometimes... two to three pages of back and forth babbling. End result: You read through two or three pages of this before someone makes a meaningful and pertinent post. I would like to see less engagement with freedom and more engagement in meaningful discussion. Shall we proceed?
robbed,to cb and the negogiations team good luck tomorrw and give them hell
some of the things i love to see is better scope better language protections for all the cities we got now better sick pay benes and get something for open time in the contract so that mgmt cannot make up lines even when there are already avail lines for the open time agent to pick from and dont let mgmt choose the line for you
His lies are mixed with truths. Knowledge mixed with ignorance. Deceit disguised as truth. His posts intice one to engage, yet all the while, distract from meaningful discussion of pertinent issues going forward. Posts that entice the members on this forum to focus more on our divided past rather than a united future of solidarity. We are all free to choose to respond or ignore. Satan himself does not "force" his agenda on anyone. Should we focus on posts, as previously mentioned, or focus more on what lies ahead? IMO... we have hopefully learned from past mistakes. With that in mind... it's time to focus on our future, learn from past mistakes, build solidarity and get on with it. Too much senseless and unproductive babbling with freedum in my opinion.What you find the most likely case is, in this case, the wrong one. He's not forcing any of you to respond to him, in fact most here have had years to place him on ignore yet not even his strongest critics have done so, even after admitting the vast majority of his expressed opinions are impotent at best. Now why is that?
His lies are mixed with truths. Knowledge mixed with ignorance. Deceit disguised as truth. His posts intice one to engage, yet all the while, distract from meaningful discussion of pertinent issues going forward.
Posts that entice the members on this forum to focus more on our divided past rather than a united future of solidarity. We are all free to choose to respond or ignore. Satan himself does not "force" his agenda on anyone. Should we focus on posts, as previously mentioned, or focus more on what lies ahead?
IMO... we have hopefully learned from past mistakes. With that in mind... it's time to focus on our future, learn from past mistakes, build solidarity and get on with it. Too much senseless and unproductive babbling with freedum in my opinion.
I disagree with your assesment of the discussion with freedom as uniting the members of this forum. In contrast, I believe the end result of such discussion is divisive. I believe his posts result only in back and forth character assasinations which, in the end, are divisive and unproductive. A strategy the company has historically used against us. Instead; this strategy is brought forth from one within our ranks. His posts reduce this thread to irrelevant theorizing and chatter. Three to four pages of irrelevant chatter one must sort through before arriving at a meaningful post. Do you support and defend this type of dialouge?Meaningful discussion such as what? Ancient arbitrations that are never resolved? How much Tim Nelson sucks? The IAM Thought Police have already ruled out any discussion that calls IAM leadership or the NC into question, so how much meaningful discussion remains?
The number of replies freedom gets and how quickly he gets them seems to indicate that, for better or for worse, people want to freely engage him. You say he disrupts solidarity, but I don't know of any poster who unites the forum more, even if it is to unite everyone in the opinion of how dumb his opinions are. You may have noticed it takes very little prompting on freedom's part to get someone (usually 700) to point out how much of a backstabber he is. Seriously, how many times has 700 employed euphemisms of betrayal in response to freedom, that he threw people under the bus, stabbed them in the back, took 30 pieces of silver, etc.? Easily dozens of times. They reply to freedom because, clearly, they want to and wish to, and will do so, as they have for years, until they put him on ignore (which they won't, and neither will you, or I, for that matter).
There's a first time for everything...
Three to four pages of irrelevant chatter one must sort through before arriving at a meaningful post. Do you support and defend this type of dialouge?
I disagree with your assesment of the discussion with freedom as uniting the members of this forum. In contrast, I believe the end result of such discussion is divisive. I believe his posts result only in back and forth character assasinations which, in the end, are divisive and unproductive. A strategy the company has historically used against us. Instead; this strategy is brought forth from one within our ranks. His posts reduce this thread to irrelevant theorizing and chatter. Three to four pages of irrelevant chatter one must sort through before arriving at a meaningful post. Do you support and defend this type of dialouge?
in fact most here have had years to place him on ignore yet not even his strongest critics have done so, even after admitting the vast majority of his expressed opinions are impotent at best. Now why is that?