Piedmont1984
Veteran
- Jan 12, 2004
- 1,737
- 897
If the Nic is used as a starting point, what need is there for a west only merger committee? On the contrary, the MOU states and even APA acknowledges the existence of two lists, east and west. If the Nic is not in effect between east and west then how do you start with the Nic going into arbitration? If the courts have not been able to implement the Nic then how do the arbitrators suddenly acquire such authority?eolesen said:Agree that the Nic will be used as a starting point by any arbitrator, and that there's going to be a dovetail at best. DOH ain't gonna happen.And no, to WT's "gotta know now" question, I wouldn't expect this to drag out as long as either US/HP and UA/CO.For starters, the numbers don't support the gamesmanship of creating a new union just because you don't like the arbitration results.Second, you won't see the process paralyzed by two MEC's within the same union refusing to come to an agreement.
The best that the west pilots can hope for is a seat at the merger table in which they get the opportunity to argue for something which resembles the Nic. The conditions necessary to implement the original Nic Award were never met and never will be met.
However, if APA truly wants to venture into arbitration and install 3 merger committees at the table then they better hurry, USAPA has already filed for arbitration IOW the provisions of 59 CAB 45.