You are playing right into AA's psychological trap. They're playing the waiting game hoping that the workers become desperate.....and according to your post IT'S WORKING!! Going on 9 years, and I will hold out until the aircraft mechanics recoup full retro and full restoration of wages and benefits, otherwise it's a big fat NO!
I just don't believe management when they pound the BK threat....I say go BK and get this BS over, otherwise pay us what WE deserve and move on with righting this ship that's been sinking for 8 years and DO YOUR JOB ARPEY!!
your point is exactly why AA has not been able to turn the ship around... if AA mgmt wanted to force a controntation with labor via the courts, they would stop refinancing their debt as it matures and allow the company to truly have no other choice than bankruptcy.
Given that the proposed new FSC contract came with cutting thousands of jobs as well as cuts in benefits for current workers that will remain, it isn't hard to see why the chances of agreements between labor and mgmt are slim.
The pilots can clearly see the same thing in their discussions which is built on the philosophy that the company will increase pay somewhat for those that remain but at the cost of increased productivity while at the same time the company will be able to reduce the number of pilots who are part of the future of the company by aggressively expanding domestic codesharing.
Given that approach to negotiations - which reflects AA's inability to cost effectively compete in the domestic marketplace and can't without significant cuts in employee costs, it isn't surprising that labor at AA is taking the tack you have expressed... stick on the current ride until it won't go any further... and if the company really becomes bankrupt, we'll deal with that issue when it arrives.
.
Actually filing BK gives the company leverage... threatening cuts and then reversing them, including reversing decisions such as closing crew bases, does nothing to build a cooperative labor-mgmt relationship and just continues the rancor that has existed for years.
.
If it made sense to close SFO 2 months ago, it still does today unless there is a complete agreement on the table that reduces costs to the point that AA can compete effectively.... and if that is the case, then they probably don't need unlimited domestic codesharing.
.
At this point, hold AA mgmt's feet to the fire and force them to either do what they say needs to be done or figure out how to run the company with the resouces it has.
.
You can't argue the company needs to be turned around and then continue to operate it as if the status quo today is acceptable.. if it doesn't work, change it.