TWU informer
Veteran
- Nov 4, 2003
- 7,550
- 3,731
The way I read it is that the AMP has adopted the one local concept that has worked well for SWA FA's, except 30% isn't going to the international. From what I gather, each local gets working capital of 25%, and there is only one treasurer at the national, instead of many throughout the country. That ought to cut costs and be able to spend money wisely. A strike fund may even be possible. I do like the part about the money belongs to the members, and not the national if the union was dissolved.
OK so AMP has a one local concept. Can you explain how the voting would take place in a way that will insure that the overhaul bases with the majority membership do not get out voted by a possible greedy line membership. In other words the TWU is already preaching that the overhaul would be outsourced (which I doubt) ao we have to have the needed information during discussions about AMP. So how does the voting block work in a one local concept?
If you could provide an example a board of directors breakdown and them voting on a simple matter would be helpful.
Break down the AA system as if would be under AMP and show me the voting block. Porve to the curious that there is nothing to fear.
I honestly don't wnat my job outsourced and I am not interested in a change that would remove the so-called "roll-call vote" that has not only screwed us all in the past, it has also helped the overhaul bases with the majority membership. The structure should maintain majority rule voting at the national level and not be some scheme to circumvent that.
After reading some of the postings here I have concern about those that blame everyone else except the TWU and the TWU Structure. So give me information that relieves any hesitation about making the change.