Checking it Out said:
Bob, the TWU has done more to help us stay employed than Amfa could ever dream of doing. By your scenario by the time Amfa comes around to do the right thing 80% of the work will be outsourced by third party maintenance. (source Amfa natl web site) With Delta and USAir in financial trouble and on the brink of going under AA will be under extreme pressure to do the same as the rest of the majors.
We have a choice here to either change and adapt or go by the wayside of the Airlines like Eastern and Pan am.
The members are smart enough to make that choice and they did earlier this year. Whether we like it or not it was a hard choice to make. On the other hand you and the rest of the Amfa wantabes attempted to destroy the overhaul work at AA like they have done at many of the Airlines they represent. How long do you think it will take to completely eliminate your job if Amfa were to get in? At United it was overnight at NW it’s a slow death.
Look at the start up carriers? Who are they contracting with to do their maintenance it’s not the majors. Why is that? The price! Unless we compete in the Industry, AA will have no choice but to Outsource work. With the TWU we have a fighting chance.
Think about this, many times the Amfa wantabes have come to the current members involved in the TWU and have asked them to stay involved if Representation was to change hands. Why? Simple! every time you ask one of the Amfa organizers to help it is typical. We don’t get involved now and won’t if Amfa gets in. So what is the difference?
I suspect that the same members will be running the show. So what has changed? You bring up the secretary for Sonny making over 100,000 a year? Than in the same statement you point out about her being on the road to help the members? I’m curious, your comment about AGW? Would you be willing to spend half the time on the road each month making 60,000 Thousand a Year? Are you willing to pay an administrator $800,000 a year to do paper work? Logic dictates you will do the same thing no matter who represents you! Complain.
If you stop and think about the trend Amfa has created and the many start-up FBO’s created from this! You will see the damage that has been created. The Line Maintenance will soon be Outsourced along with the Heavy Maintenance work. So what is the answer? Definitely not Amfa!!!
CIO;
I would think that with all the money your Local is spending on a PR firm that they could help you put on a better spin than that.
The TWU has helped us stay employed? Tell that to all the guys who are laid off.
Outsourcing predates AMFA. Outsourcing has been the subject of negotiations since at least 1950. In 43 years there has been little change in the companys contractual rights as far as outsourcing. Whats even worse is that the TWU is lax at enforcing what limits there are, instead they expect the members to look for violations and the locals to foot the bill for enforcing the contract, Charlotte for example. The only "right" we have is to be allowed to lower our wage to the point where outsourcing is not cost effective. The TWU will even open contracts early to do this instead of fighting for a scope clause.
You are right that we need to change and adapt, unions that is. The TWU refuses to change, even after 20 consecutive years of concessionary bargaining they still insist that its not their fault. They blame the members.
So now the TWU members were smart enough, do you mean smart enough considering the fact that you claimed that they only have 15 minute attention spans?
I believe that all of the outsourcing and layoffs at UAL were done prior to AMFA.
NWA had layoffs and so did we but unless those guys are laid off at least two years they will still make more than those of us who were not laid of at AA. Layoffs have always been a part of this industry.
AMFA secured a defined cap on outsourcing where none existed, they got more done in one contract than the TWU did in 50 years. Prove that AMFA has advocated outsoucing at any of the Airlines where they represent workers.
Listening to you it seems that you believe that Unions have no power. You make it sound like the company can simply do away with all of us unless we "change" ie "work for lower wages" . How about demanding that we keep Overhaul in house or we all strike? Did you ever think of that one? You seem to think that union people got what they did over the years out of the goodness of the Airlines heart. Its understandable that you may think this way since the last time this union struck at AA was 1969. I was in the third grade then. After all to you people in Local 514 there is very little difference between Union and management right? Doesnt the Union flag hang right up there with the company flag? Dont you give out shirts boasting of your company/union "partnership"?
Now I dont think that union and management should be at each others throats constantly, only when they are trying to take something away, but they should not be in bed together either.
Right now a lot of airlines are contracting out to the cheapest provider they can find. The only reason why AA is not doing it is because they pay less in house than they can get it outsourced. So where is the union advantage? If we are going to "adapt" to whatever the company wants in order to remain competative then why pay dues to the TWU?
When the hull losses start adding up they will go back to doing more work in house or sending it to UAL who recently announced their entry into the MRO business. SWA has announced that they are planning to bring more work in house, as they get larger it makes more sense and Jet Blue is building a new hangar at JFK. Outsourcing is not always the cheapest route, sometimes even with paying a higher wage its cheaper to keep work in house where the company has greater control over other costs and quality. If not then most of your work would have been outsourced years ago.
Delta Airlines and Brittish Airlines have taken on enough work at JFK to completely offset their Maintenance costs. They pay their mechanics more than AA. AA has the biggest hangar on the airport yet they contract in little work. If they did then we would be the "Mexicans or Southeast Asians of the airport-the low wage workers".
AA has been outsourcing forv years. Remember when they were sending the A-300 engines to Europe and Canada? The company found that they were not saving any money so they brought it back in house. It was not strong TWU language, it was economics. Work that came back without the TWU.
The fact is with the TWU we have no chance, after 20 years I think that all AA workers have given the TWU enough chances. They got to go.
Even if the same people are running the show at the Local level getting rid of Sonny Hall, Jim Little and all the other incompetants will change things a lot. Members will no longer have all the excuses they have now for not participating, not to say that all of a sudden everyone will, and they will have the right to hold everyone accountable. They wont have a Jim Little that they cant vote out. Members will have the right to recall all officers, something they do not have now.
I did not say that Sonnys secretary was there to help the members, you did. Whatever the AGW decides to pay is up to them. $60,000 may be too low but $200,000 is excessive when all they can do is bring back concessions. If we were going in the opposite direction, then they could pay $1,000,000 and I would not care. If they were accountable then the pay would not be as much of an issue. Its just fustrating to be forced to pay excessive salaries to people who do not perform and that we cant get rid of.
You keep repeating the same old lie that AMFA started the outsourcing trend. AA has had one of the highest rates for outsourcing and we are TWU. AA has been outsoucing work as long as the TWU has been on the property. The March 9,1950 letter from CR Smith proves this. In 1985 they revised the contract to allow the company to contract out galley equipement as in the August 1, 1985 letter and what about Rockwell Collins, Matsushiutu and Tank Tigers? Thats just the out of TWU outsourcing, what about the transfer of work to other departments? If we did R&D we could get hundreds of mechanics back. How many mechanics jobs did the TWU save when they transferred R&D and Deiicing to Fleet? How many jobs were saved by taking away a week of vacation that we earned last year? How many jobs were saved by moving the S back to 1998?
The fact is that the TWU is the trendsetter and they have been for 20 years.
They set the trend for lowering wages across the industry. AA, SWA flight attendants, Worldwide baggage handlers, if you want to find the lowest wages in the industry just look for the TWU logo. The greatest threat to real union workers is the TWU.
When confronted with this they respond;
1) "Those concessions created jobs"
or when that excuse gets debunked,
2) "The members voted for it."
The first excuse is right out of the union busters and the RTW handbook. It is an anti fair wage statement that says that low wages create jobs. Its shameful when a union becomes so much of a business that they use the same chiche's.
The second excuse is simply a disengenunous cop out and typical of what can be expected of unaccountable incompetant self serving leaders.
Insanity is defined as performing the same act and expecting a different result. What can we realistically expect from an unchanged TWU? 20 more years of concessions. The fact is that we dont know what to expect from AMFA over the long haul, but we know that with the TWU we will continue to lose, and there is not much left. There is one definite answer , get out of the TWU!
I'll ask again.
What is wrong with the concept of getting all the mechanics in one union?
Would not such a structure enhance our bargaining power?
Do you believe that there is an advantage to having mechanics split up between several non-airline unions as opposed to being united in one union?
Could the TWU ever offer us this option, assuming that the TWU does not expect that with AA's lower labor costs they put everyone else out of business?
The fact is that 20 years of concessions prove that we have given the TWU/ATD ample opportunity to prove themselves as a union. With this latest agreement they have shown that it was 20 years wasted, they failed, utterly and completely. The TWU/ATD is a small quasi-union that has a strategy of offering employers sub-union wages and benifits in the hopes that the employer grows with the competative edge that the low wage provides. Thats why most TWU/ATD drives fail. The TWU/ATD is a scab organization. Its leaders cross picket lines and cater to management.