MCI AFL-CIO
Advanced
- Sep 29, 2003
- 151
- 0
Dan Cunningham and Bob Owens deserved what they received. The trials were done per the Constitution and the results were the same. The majority of the TWU members were getting tired of these self interest elected officers advocating the withdrawl from the TWU while collecting Pay from the UnionChecking it Out said:Dan Cunningham and Bob Owens deserved what they received. The trials were done per the Constitution and the results were the same. The majority of the TWU members were getting tired of these self interest elected officers advocating the withdrawl from the TWU while collecting Pay from the Union.
If either one of them had any morals or ethics they would have taken it apon themselfs and done the honorable thing and resigned. But it is obvious neither have the caliber it takes to do the honorable thing so the Constitution was enforced.
We the majority of the TWU favored this avenue. The International did the right thing. No different than amfa or any other organization.
If it is true Dan Cunningham and Bob Owens deserved what they received, Clear somehting for us at our local, 530.................
Do we as members, who voted in a fair election and voted for the Presidnet of our local, Butch, who won fairly, but after less than 3 months, our E Board, decided Butch was not a team player and held a hearing, allowing his successor, to do the questioning, and voted to oust as our president, the president, the membership voted for, not his successor, and yet, 5 months later, after numerous appeals to the international, and petitions signed and sent to the international, we, Local 530 have not heard the outcome of the appeal? It has yet to be heard.
Also, do we as a local, deserve to not, have an election to replace the VP, who succeeded Butch? How long is reasonable to expect to hear the decision on what the e board did to our local? What is our local to do for representation, we are shorthanded if our representatives should be summoned again for anything contractural?
Before all the hollering, I want to clarify this,...................this could have happened to our local if we were AMFA,......................this did not happen to our local because we are TWU. This happened because, our local, your local, anyones local, can and will have the same problem, its called "clashing" or as we say here, Butch didnt fit into the "click" our E Board officers have.
Our E Board wants to be able to dictate to how and what the president (Butch) does, this could and will happen at any local, TWU or AMFA, if the officers dont see eye to eye, and if there is even a spark of jealousy
We the majority of the TWU favored this avenue. The International did the right thing. No different than amfa or any other organization
Its time that the TWU ATD does get more involved, its time the ATD starts addressing the cares and needs of the membership. If it is the right thing what the TWU did to Bob Owens and Dan Cunningham, its past time they do the right thing for our local and your local. Its past time that we as members demand a change to the constitution and by laws, to take away the power the E Board has allowing them the luxury of "overthrowing" officers the membership voted in.
My problem is not with the TWUATD, but with clarifying, within locals. I didnt know when we elected officers of our local, we gave them the power to judge other officers as well as members? Judge without merit, but rather through jealousy
Our local acted quicly to oust Butch, but yet, our local stalls at requesting a speedy and thorough decision, .............If the verdict holds, Its time for us to vote a replacement, 5 months is to long