Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok company boy.700UW said:Whats a matter big boy?
Cant debate the facts and actual case law and processes?
Cant admit you are wrong once gain?
And show us proof and facts that the IAM will tell US to close FLL.
Shall I call Rick?
1AA said:I agree on the contribution versus the match. The TWU sold us out again with the 401K. The pilots get 14% and the flight Attendants I believe get a 9.5% or 10% contribution. The TWU on the other hand did not want to break ranks with its consistent record of concessions decided to do one better and negotiate the lowest percentage of all groups to a 5.5% contribution but with a catch that the employer must match at least 5.5% to get the 5.5% from the company. That needs to be changed but I doubt the TWU or the IAM or whatever union will represent us in the future is capable to negotiate a better deal and remove the MATCH from the employer and go with a straight contribution only plan.
. I prefer 0 match like the pilots and flight attendants have. A match means you have to chip in to get a measly 5.5%. Pilots get 14% without contributing a penny of their salary. To us it is another form of a paycut if we want the company to contribute. Thank you twu for a great deal.Real tired said:I wouldn't feel to bad about a 5.5% match, in fact, I dream about that much. Here at US it's 0%.
you have a cash value 4% contribution. So you don't have to put in anything and they put in$1.40 per hour plus you get a part of your dead coworkers $1.40. AT AA if you put in nothing you get nothing. Would I want your plan? No but ours sucks as well.Real tired said:I wouldn't feel to bad about a 5.5% match, in fact, I dream about that much. Here at US it's 0%.
Real tired said:
I wouldn't feel to bad about a 5.5% match, in fact, I dream about that much. Here at US it's 0%.