Hackman, I understand why CIO might be hesitant to answer IN WRITING. In Tulsa many (maybe including CIO) are proclaiming the contract WOULD BE void (abrogated) if AMFA were to become our new representative. The result they say? MASSIVE LAYOFFS (FEAAR). The implications are that there would be IMMEDIATE layoffs at AA, hence, if you don't have late 80's seniority YOUR GONE. Every informed individual (and even CIO) knows this to be UNTRUE but many in Tulsa are UNinformed. THE CONTRACT BECOMES AMMENDABLE DEC. 31 2008 REGARDLESS OF WHO REPRESENTS US. Second, AA WOULD NOT "CHANGE A THING" IN THE CONTRACT if AMFA were to become our representative. They have the LOWEST average wage in the industry and aim to keep it.
How else can Tulsa be controlled? It appears they must be deceived into submission. The line (title 1) averages 84% signed cards to authorize an election. Tulsa 33%. MCI 25%. CIO, by your refusal to answer you left me no choice. Now tell me I'm wrong. Yours, Birdman
How else can Tulsa be controlled? It appears they must be deceived into submission. The line (title 1) averages 84% signed cards to authorize an election. Tulsa 33%. MCI 25%. CIO, by your refusal to answer you left me no choice. Now tell me I'm wrong. Yours, Birdman