Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's mighty funny...I've been the "common worker" for well over a decade. So, if I get mine, how is that class warfare???700UW said:Yep your true class warfare is showing, screw the common worker as long as you get yours!
MW: I see your sharp-tongued retorts haven't lost their ability to incite <_< .mweiss said:OK...let's focus specifically on your comment of "an honest wage for an honest day's work," with reference to "all those free hours of pay that you [a salaried employee] are not getting [paid for]." Is this different from the "all those free hours of pay that" flight attendants aren't getting paid for, as negotiated by AFA?
Yes, I removed "a necessary" from your quote. That's just an additional adjective.
Good, I'm glad we got back to this. Laying off at all levels of seniority keeps the natural order of things and forces people to work harder to justify their continued employment.E-TRONS said:BTW, This entire debate originated from a statement of laying off employees out of seniority order.....and implying that it was alright thing to do ??? Let's stay focused !!
USA320,USA320Pilot said:Just one more point...
The pay cut proposal will reduce US Airways' pilot pay rates below America West pay rates, and increase the pay cap to the highest level of any legacy carrier.
Why is the pay cut so big? Because the pilots want their DC Plan left untouched and no more pilot furloughs.
ALPA presented a serious offer to the company, and they have acknowledged that fact to the Negotiating Committee. The MEC engaged in good faith bargaining, and now it's time for the company to engage in good faith bargaining too.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
Light years,Light Years said:So the pilots stance is that they'll take a hefty pay cut (as in actual pay) in return for keeping the DC plan and current list. Fair enough.
I wonder if the F/As would be interested in negotiating a deal where only the current F/As keep pensions etc, and anyone recalled or hired in the future would have a better profit sharing or 401k plan instead. This seems to be how the LCCs save a lot on employees costs.
Please tell me that US management is smart enough than to believe they are going to dump a bunch of capacity into AA, CO, DL, NW, and UA's hubs and succeed. Last time I checked, US is outserved by their competitors in most of these markets.USA320Pilot said:The “Transformation Plan†envisions flying high frequency quick turns in markets like Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington to Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Dallas, Houston, etc. These routes have high O&D revenue and are where people want to fly point-to-point, therefore, an aircraft with a lower CASM such as the A320 family aircraft provide better economics than the 70 to 110-seat aircraft per management’s business plan presentation provided last week to the pilots.
USSA20,USA320Pilot said:The plan above should get ALPA near the $295 million annual cost reduction and include a bankruptcy S.1113 letter, per ALPA's negotiating term sheet and MEC direction.
Finally, there is reason to believe the company is preparing for a pre-packaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, which will keep the ATSB funds intact, not require DIP financing, and provide a POR within 180 days.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
How about removing a different adjective instead.mweiss said:Once again: "A union is...EVIL."
Yes, I removed "a necessary" from your quote. That's just an additional adjective.
Except, apparently, for Delta.Bear96 said:How about removing a different adjective instead.
In the airline biz, unions are simply necessary.
Well that is a pretty generalized broad-brush statment, wouldn't you say?USFlyer said:Not to burst your bubble, but ... I'm a salaried employee who is only required to work 40 hours/week. However, the job, with travel time, often entails 75-80 hours/week. I don't see one penny for the additional hours (nor have I had any raises, bonuses or benefit increases in the past three years either). And, neither do any of the other hard working, salaried folk who live and work in the US.
Jeez, where did I say US employees? I don't have a clue what goes on in CCY, nor do I really care. I'm speaking totally from my own experience, where working 75-80 hours/week is norm. I should know better than to have this discussion yet again on this board ... it's not worth the time.PITbull said:Well that is a pretty generalized broad-brush statment, wouldn't you say?
All the hard-working salaried US Employees putting in 75-80 hours a week and getting paid for only a measley 40 hours.......
Mweiss,mweiss said:Except, apparently, for Delta.