USAirUnited
Advanced
- Dec 17, 2002
- 235
- 0
The buyout doesn't look all that bad. What do you guys think?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks similar to the WN proposal with one exception if I'm reading it right.USAirUnited said:The buyout doesn't look all that bad. What do you guys think?
Get over it. What are you afraid of.?? Don't tell me what to keep to myself. This does pertain to the company and the employees. Why would I, which against the forum ettiguette to divulge people's names. I am not that stupid. Take this email for what it is worth. I really do not care.RumorS said:RESERVATIONISTS: Furlough 680. Move remaining reservationists to INT.
Kt if reading this correctly Move remaining reservations to INT, That would be a closure of PIT so you did post that. I understand that it was just an email. Perhaps an email that should of been kept to yourself or backed up by someone reliable. And trust me I am as chilled as I can be!
Maybe you should keep to yourself. How come you are the only one who cant get over the post? Its been said from the beginning, numerous times, that its a rumoured wish list that originated in an email from an unnamed source. How much more of a disclaimer do you need?RumorS said:RESERVATIONISTS: Furlough 680. Move remaining reservationists to INT.
Kt if reading this correctly Move remaining reservations to INT, That would be a closure of PIT so you did post that. I understand that it was just an email. Perhaps an email that should of been kept to yourself or backed up by someone reliable. And trust me I am as chilled as I can be!
Or perhaps it's an email that "should of" been shared with all of us. Provided that it carries the appropriate disclaimer, which kt's did, it's far better to have more information than less.RumorS said:I understand that it was just an email. Perhaps an email that should of been kept to yourself or backed up by someone reliable.
Except for MDA, of course, where there is no medical for six months no matter how many years you have with the company.ktflyhome said:Golden 1: I give you a lot of credit. It must be really rough. I am beginning to see the conspiracy and plot with this company. Express everything....lower the bar...then bring on the mainline planes again. How utterly conniving.
I wish you the best. It is a sad day, when we settle for sh$$ wages, just to keep the medical.
Well, I think it would put an immediate stop to any preferential transfer bids. There would probably be many "takers" in every city, therefore if say someone wanted to "move to the beach" he would be filling a "buyout vacancy" and have to start work at $9.00/hour regardless of years of service. One thing I don't understand is why give retiree benefits only to those age 50 or 55 even if they only have 10 years of service and NOT to a 17-25 year agent just because they are in their say "40's"? Regardless, it is very tempting..hummm $$$$$$? I wonder how that money would be taxed?USAirUnited said:The buyout doesn't look all that bad. What do you guys think?
Who the heck are you……You must be out of your mind……. Vote my self out of a JOB what do you think 13 per hour is. Go back under that rock you crawled out from under……USFlyer said:Just remember, a no vote could mean Chapter 11 again and an abrogation of the contracts, with maintenance and reservations outsourced. The company need only show it attempted to reach a negotiated settlement. As I've said many times, the choice is yours, not mine. But, before you vote yourself out of a job (and I realize a yes vote could also be voting yourself out of a job), just think about all the options you have outside of US.
But, I'm not taking sides, as I'm not sure (to be brutally honest) what I would do at this point ... seems like a no win situation.