love ya twiceI am on the phone with him right now!!! lol
I guess I pi$$ed in his Wheaties!!!! lol![]()

love ya twiceI am on the phone with him right now!!! lol
I guess I pi$$ed in his Wheaties!!!! lol![]()
So what??!!? Omar is great at what she does, and this does not seem like any conflict of interest to me. Why shouldn't she be flying around making sure we are in compliance? Should the AFA not have a hand in that? Dam right they should! I would rather have an AFA elected official out there with us being PROACTIVE (offering suggestions to avoid mgmt punishment) rather than simply defending the select few who constantly screw up. (And we all know who they are....) She will defend you no matter what, but I appreciate the fact that the AFA has input into this matter and Omar is great for the job. We don't even know exactly what she will be doing, if it is true, and you are all hanging her. You are all prematurely overreacting once again....Ok, I get it. Its not a check ride. BUt let me say this, we are always complaining about reserve issues, meanwhile, our reserve chair is going to be spending her time flying around giving us advice and "helping us" with inflight issues. SHe will have the luxury of making her own schedule. Flying when she wants and not being on call for 24/7. and not living on 73 hours pay. What reserve issues? We have none.
They only keep track of procedures that are being followed and not being followed so the company knows which areas need attention.
Exactly. So let's have supervisors doing check rides or gate checks, and simply removing non- compliant flight attendants from their trip without pay. Give them a chance right there at the gate to make it compliant. If they can't, see ya! What's so hard about that? At least the OPR's/ RSV's would be utilized more.The company should just save their money. What good does having these people on there do anyway? I mean come on. Everyone that works here knows what they are supposed to be donig and if they are not doing it properly, it because they chose not to do it. Just beause you have another flight attendant telling you that you did it wrong, does not mean you will do it properly. Let's face it, most of these f/a's doing these speical assignments are maagement suck ups that just want to get out of flying anyway.
who is bill lehman?I believe Bill Lehmans wife is also doing this????? :down:
sky high states: PUT THE "SERVICE PROCEDURE" BACK ON THE MANIFEST. GO OVER IT IN THE PREFLIGHT BRIEFING..............AND FOLLOW IT!!!
only stating opinions
Yes quite a difference. Paying all of those people to come up with soulutions and we get a brochure. Talk about some meaningful change. Again to my point where managment does not want to look at the real issues that matter to us, but hey look, we made a brochure.we just got an e-mail from our focus group and mgmt is asking us to give them our feedback on what things that are in the Policies and procedures manual should we have access to on the aircraftService procedures, um stuff, things like that are on a list so they can publish a small handbook or something :huh: They said something like a "brochure" , i take that as something simple, small and easy to carry if you want. Focus group sounds like it's making a difference.
![]()
Yes quite a difference. Paying all of those people to come up with soulutions and we get a brochure. Talk about some meaningful change. Again to my point where managment does not want to look at the real issues that matter to us, but hey look, we made a brochure.
who is bill lehman?
wow , i did not know that about him. he is a friend of mine. i am gonna have to talk to him aobut that. he is very big into heritage stuff . he and wally bold(pit customer service manager and a super guy) put together all of the heritage display cases at headquarters and the phx flight center and is in the process of putting one up at the clt training center.he os a huge airline geek like me that's why we know eachother. but that stuff you just wrote about is not cool . not cool at all. :huh:He was a former VP for council 66, then was elected president but didn't finish his term. He was forced to resign under the pressure of a recall campaign when members found out he was making all sorts of added income via inappropriate expense reports as well as double dipping. A huge recall campaign was started and he resigned before he could be recalled. Formal charges were filed against him with international over the fiscal issues and he was found guilty on some of the charges and forced to pay back money. Let's just say this fellow "speaks with a forked tongue."
The kicker? He's planning on running for president again and must think that the members of council 66 have short memories, but we don't. We have not forgotten and if he does in fact run he better put on a flak jacket, because the anti-Lehman campaign that will come out will make the previous recall effort look like a walk in the park.
So, as you can see, union dysfunctionalism is alive and well in the west!![]()