EastUS1 said:
OK..How about it? What you've been is extremely lucky and nothing more, period. One of your tribe even managed to destroy a perfectly good 737 after landing, simply from having a single thrust reverser inop and known to be wired to prevent deployment, and, after of course properly instructing all at American on how to be perfect pilots, perhaps you could brag to these clearly much lesser than AWA outfits as well?:
http://www.nytimes.com/1983/04/01/us/air-force-s-precision-team-after-5-deaths-to-fly-again.html
http://www.blueangels-usn.org/accident_history.html
I'd suggest being a bit gentle with the American folks, as many of them also know people who've perished from the business of flight, and they "might," just possibly mistake "spartan" pride for naively childish foolishness....Just sayin'...
Ahhh... Eastholius Moronicus... The prodigious little poo factory himself.
This last little missive from Moronville illustrates perfectly, what's so sadly lacking in both your intellect and your integrity. You obviously labor under the false assumption that utilizing a few multi-syllabic words makes you appear astute and principled. You are neither.
First; it was an A320, the thrust reverser was inoperative, however, they are NOT wired to prevent inadvertent deployment. Additionally, the procedure at the time was not to operate both reverse levers simultaneously, as it is now, but to leave the inoperative lever down and activate only the operative reverser. The pilot in question apparently forgot that his reverser was inoperative until shortly after touchdown, and then in an apparent attempt to stow the inoperative lever only, inadvertently placed the thrust lever in question to the "climb" detent.
The aircraft exited the runway. The procedure was amended.
Your first problem is a lack of integrity. You did not make a mistake and say it was a B737, you did not know what you were talking about, but you had no qualms about spewing bulls__t from your keyboard. This is why a fairly common reaction to you online is an immediate "minus one". I suspect that it probably happens that way in real life too.
Your second issue is a lack of logic. I'm not sure if the circuits are just addled with alcohol, but your idea that safety, or a safety record is just a matter of "what you've been is extremely lucky, and nothing more, period.", is profoundly ignorant.
I believe that most thinking aviators realize implicitly, that an element of luck, or lack thereof, and an element of preparedness are BOTH inherent in an excellent safety record. Think, Fate is the Hunter, the "golden BB" or what have you versus a proactive exercise of safety related policies and programs.
America West offered such things as: a "no-fly" list, no jeopardy training, additional sim time if requested, an ASAP (self reporting) program, a fatigue policy, a sympathetic Chief Pilot's office and so forth.
The third problem that you have is a profound inability to self-critique, a classic symptom of a narcissistic personality disorder. If the issue in question is yourself, your ex-airline or your ex-branch of military service, you exhibit a distinct dishonesty or inability to discuss sometimes unpleasant realities, behaviors and actions.
Shall we discuss the Fairchild B52 and it's aircraft commander v.s. Al Haynes?
KTGSD!!!