CATPISS1, Actually we never tried to screw you out of anything, Conditions and restrictions are protections for that, but you did not keep us on LOA93, LOA 93 afforded the EAST "SCOPE" and "CHANGE OF CONTROL" provisions in our contract highly valuable, so valuable the "KIRBY" was not economically viable to the majority of EAST under the "NIC" ie the EAST majority would have a zero sum monitary gain and the WEST would gain on their 12year plus leapfrog seniority. STATUS QUO , remember PARKER said" NO WEST HIRING FOR AT LEAST 4 YEARS", Under the MOU the EAST gave up SCOPE and CHANGE OF CONTROL, ie SNAPBACKS in our contract to move forward, you use litigation to move backwards, so be it! My guess your request for a seat is granted, lawsuits a plenty, just sayin!